Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kelly: "The lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War." [View all]raging moderate
(4,624 posts)41. Some abolitionists had suggested paying some small compensation.
Since many slave ships had actually docked in northern ports, staffed and owned by northerners, and slavery had existed in the north as well, some people in the north suggested that the south should not be made to bear the full economic loss of the bogus "property" involved in slavery. These people suggested that perhaps some sort of compensation could be paid to slave "owners," or to the south in general. The slavers rejected this idea.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kelly: "The lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War." [View all]
highplainsdem
Oct 2017
OP
Some people say that if the North had let slavery continue, it would have faded in a few decades.
Girard442
Oct 2017
#11
So there really was not a compromise. You allow slaves or you do not. No halfway there.
Mediumsizedhand
Oct 2017
#14
"A few decades" is one minute, one second, too long. "Some people" aren't fit to breathe.
WinkyDink
Oct 2017
#34
Ted Lieu's response: The USA exists because President Lincoln did not compromise.
highplainsdem
Oct 2017
#4
it was 3/5th and ironically the south wanted it higher and the north wanted it lower.
unblock
Oct 2017
#21
I think Nevernose meant that 4/5 would have been Kelly's idea of a compromise.
highplainsdem
Oct 2017
#22
Chelsea Clinton:There is no "compromise" regarding slavery, ever, & the original 3/5ths compromise
highplainsdem
Oct 2017
#25
i think Kelly is really stupid . i bet if he was black he would have never made it up where he was
JI7
Oct 2017
#26
That's true only in the sense that there was no more compromising to be done
Algernon Moncrieff
Oct 2017
#30
I've seen others suggest on Twitter that Kellly might be trying just to create a distraction, but I
highplainsdem
Oct 2017
#44
Let's see. We had the Three-Fifths Compromise, which gave the slaveholding states
struggle4progress
Oct 2017
#51