Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women adrift at sea for five months had beacon but didn't turn it on [View all]Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)72. They were in a boat, surrounded by water, big water, ocean water.
Ocean water can be made drinkable with a reverse osmosis filter. Add some solar cells and one has all the fresh water one needs, until the pre-filters become clogged with particulate. It's not like the days of old, where 5 months adrift was a death sentence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Women adrift at sea for five months had beacon but didn't turn it on [View all]
jmowreader
Oct 2017
OP
Then they are even bigger idiots than getting lost at sea for 5 months already indicated
mythology
Oct 2017
#25
It doesn't add up. I wonder if they were hoping for publicity and a book deal?
octoberlib
Oct 2017
#31
I think pretty much everybody noticed they looked really good for being five month adrift.
LisaL
Oct 2017
#48
I didn't get the impression that any 24hour danger was from exposure or illness or starvation
unblock
Oct 2017
#33
I guess that would have been a really good time to use that emergency beacon, then. No?
LisaL
Oct 2017
#35
They said they couldn't sail because of a broken spreader on the Vice story...
EX500rider
Oct 2017
#37