Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

babsbunny

(8,560 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:50 PM Jul 2012

GI’s lawyers largely barred from raising at trial any harm done to US interests by WikiLeaks [View all]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/attorneys-in-military-wikileaks-case-argue-over-whether-trial-should-include-harm-discussion/2012/07/19/gJQAlwEHvW_story.html


By Associated Press, Updated: Thursday, July 19, 6:02 PM

FORT MEADE, Md. — A military judge on Thursday largely barred an Army private from presenting evidence at his trial that the mountain of classified information he’s accused of leaking did little harm to U.S. national security and foreign relations.

Army Col. Denise Lind, presiding over a pretrial hearing at Fort Meade, agreed with prosecutors that the extent of any damage is irrelevant to the 22 charges against Pfc. Bradley Manning. He’s accused of aiding the enemy by sending hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and war logs to the secret-spilling website WikiLeaks. That charge carries a possible life sentence.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GI’s lawyers largely barr...