General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Inside Hillary Clintons Secret Takeover of the DNC (By DONNA BRAZILE November 02, 2017) [View all]virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Bernie's joint-fundraising agreement was not like Hillary's.
To quote the article.
"The agreementsigned by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Eliasspecified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the partys finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings."
also
"Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fundthat figure represented $10,000 to each of the 32 states parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement$320,000and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn
so effectively
"Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillarys campaign was holding"
Using this method, individual donors were able to give $355,000 dollars to Hillary. This was a complete subversion of campaign limits and was not in their press release.
I wish that people would stop defending this behavior.