Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie had a joint fundraising agreement with the DNC too. [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)26. In 2015 Clinton wasn't the nominee, either.
This is really ridiculous misdirection. With regard to the relationship between a campaign and the DNC, Brazile's comments expressly drew the distinction according to whether it was before or after the time when that campaign's candidate became the nominee.
Brazile was willing to draw the line when the candidate had enough delegates to win, even if some Democrats hadn't yet had the chance to vote. Whether one draws the line then or waits until after the last primary or waits until after the actual nomination at the convention is debatable. But there is no justification for the DNC to extend such special privileges to one of the candidates in a contested race when not one single primary or caucus has yet been held.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
++++perfectly stated. Loyalty to his talking points is not a Democratic value.
R B Garr
Nov 2017
#13
that isn't factual...that is a slant. Coalition building is powerful, but it can come with dilution
JCanete
Nov 2017
#18
Its still slant, because you act like coalition bulidng for Clinton wasn't empowering her own place
JCanete
Nov 2017
#20
you are defining one person as doing work towards goals, and the other as just saving his own skin.
JCanete
Nov 2017
#22
I think this is more about Brazille and Schultz than Clinton and Sanders, they can both go to hell.
phleshdef
Nov 2017
#14
O'Malley (unlike Hillary Clinton) was a lifelong Democrat. Was he offered a similar agreement?
Jim Lane
Nov 2017
#34
Oh, right, I forgot. Therefore we should ignore everything he says. Good point. (n/t)
Jim Lane
Nov 2017
#56
No, but I wouldn't bet he can guide us to a win...I blame Nader mostly for his loss...but
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#61
What facts? From what I can tell... the 'facst' were either out and out lied about or
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#63