Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tom Rinaldo

(23,187 posts)
5. I've tried to
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 09:03 AM
Nov 2017

A part of moving on includes incorporating lessons from the past so as to do better in the future. Working to improve the functioning of the Democratic Party is not in itself divisive, although as with all things, people will divide over what is and is not an improvement. It seems to me that our Democratic Party sees value in learning, with the advantage of hindsight, what has not worked out as well as envisioned in the past.

This is from today's Washington Post:

"...Kleeb, who along with Weaver is a member of the Democrats’ post-primary “unity commission,” said the party had made some amends under Perez’s leadership. In his campaign to run the DNC and since, Perez has chastised Wasserman Schultz for turning the party into a vehicle for the presidential campaign.

After Brazile’s book excerpt surfaced, state chairs began calling and emailing each other about a change to the DNC’s rules and bylaws that would forbid any arrangement like the one Clinton got. Buckley and other DNC members suggested that the party should also give DNC members access to its budget, which would have made it clear much earlier how the joint fundraising agreement was affecting the flow of money.

“I will co-sponsor that amendment and vote for it,” Buckley said. “There’s so much reform that has to happen.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democrats-express-outrage-over-allegations-of-early-control-for-clinton-in-2016/2017/11/02/84e949da-c000-11e7-97d9-bdab5a0ab381_story.html?utm_term=.913dd8ce0547

More about Kleeb: "After the election, the effects of the Clinton fundraising effort hit some state parties hard. Jane Kleeb, who took over Nebraska’s Democratic Party in late 2016, discovered that the party had accrued $35,000 in debt for the Clinton campaign."

More about Buckley: "Ray Buckley, the chairman of New Hampshire’s Democratic Party, said that he first learned of the agreement while serving as DNC vice chair in 2016. “The day that Donna discovered this, she called me and I almost passed out,” Buckley said. “We were blatantly misled.”

I have no interest in trying to demonize either the Clinton campaign or Hillary herself. I can understand why prior arrangements evolved the way they did at the time, even if I do not approve of all the steps that were taken. Hind sight is 20/20. Foresight is a much more important quality, and the Democratic Party needs some now in moving forward. Learn from our mistakes, get our house in order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You will if they are the nominee Not Ruth Nov 2017 #1
Because imperatives work so well on Democrats? nt. Amimnoch Nov 2017 #54
K&R stonecutter357 Nov 2017 #2
not in 2018 lapfog_1 Nov 2017 #3
Yes, me too. LiberalBrooke Nov 2017 #8
Bernie has had his ideas forever. nt Lucky Luciano Nov 2017 #10
Where you get the idea that many of Bernie's supporters voted for Jill PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2017 #60
This. And if I were in Vermont for Senate mythology Nov 2017 #18
Hillary's Not Running dlk Nov 2017 #4
and bernies an independant..not a dem. i will vote for the DEM nominee samnsara Nov 2017 #25
Just cant do it hey? Twisty Nov 2017 #51
Agree. I will 100% a Democratic Party candidate. nt. Amimnoch Nov 2017 #55
Ditto leanforward Nov 2017 #59
I've tried to Tom Rinaldo Nov 2017 #5
THIS KPN Nov 2017 #21
after everything we've been through bluestarone Nov 2017 #37
Another intelligent post. If everyone would use their common sense pangaia Nov 2017 #58
I'm voting for the Democratic candidates rock Nov 2017 #6
I may have to hold my nose, lark Nov 2017 #9
Yep rock Nov 2017 #11
me too as long as they are a true dem and not someone... samnsara Nov 2017 #26
I agree Billb93 Nov 2017 #7
I'm glad to be voting for the same person I voted for in 2016. Scoopster Nov 2017 #12
I'd LOVE to see Wes Clark run again. Amimnoch Nov 2017 #56
Neither one will run in 2020. . . . BigDemVoter Nov 2017 #13
I fully expect that Bernie will run in 2020. Joe Biden too. (eom) StevieM Nov 2017 #33
I like Bernie. . . a LOT. . . . BigDemVoter Nov 2017 #38
I am pretty sure that Bernie will run and Biden seems likely too. StevieM Nov 2017 #41
SteveM, here's something you might like karynnj Nov 2017 #53
I haven't had a chance to watch the video yet, but I wanted to reply to your thoughtful post. StevieM Nov 2017 #61
Also, just to be clear, I didn't deliberately put a smiley face after the phrase "botched joke." StevieM Nov 2017 #62
Do what I have always done...... VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT. secondwind Nov 2017 #14
good for you! samnsara Nov 2017 #27
Can't ignore the fact we hold no power. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #15
OMG, Please fuck yes!! eom docgee Nov 2017 #16
What we need is some new blood at the top of the ticket. world wide wally Nov 2017 #17
or swalwell... samnsara Nov 2017 #28
Jeff Merkley from Oregon is pretty darned good! Ukapau Nov 2017 #48
I hope Vermont residents vote for Bernie in 2018. thesquanderer Nov 2017 #19
and at this point, I'd hold my nose to vote for Warren. wyldwolf Nov 2017 #20
Shes created quite a problem for herself BannonsLiver Nov 2017 #23
"the Bernie folks" have absolutely NOT hated her. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #34
Really? BannonsLiver Nov 2017 #47
You're right. That's why threads like this happen Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #50
BS is not a Dem and HRC is retired. samnsara Nov 2017 #22
Brazile is making stuff up videohead5 Nov 2017 #24
im kinda agreeing... she sure got her knickers inna bunch over something samnsara Nov 2017 #29
Agreed. But this phony "proof" is being treated by the left the same way that talk about Obama's StevieM Nov 2017 #31
Well, the big difference here Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #36
Nope, I don't see the difference. The other is also BS lies. StevieM Nov 2017 #39
She "revealed" an agreement Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #43
She revealed nothing of substance. The DNC did nothing for HRC, nor could they have if they StevieM Nov 2017 #45
I sure blame Wasserman-Schultz for, among other things, refusing to hold more debates, Ukapau Nov 2017 #49
I want to know LittleGirl Nov 2017 #30
WE ARE. kpete Nov 2017 #32
YES! yes, we are! :-) LittleGirl Nov 2017 #35
Russians stirring the ole Shitpot!,,,,, Cryptoad Nov 2017 #40
yep bluestarone Nov 2017 #44
Nor will I! I'm an independent with dem leanings but MojoWrkn Nov 2017 #42
I like Warren and Gillibrand. ananda Nov 2017 #46
Both of them are great and strong candidates! Ukapau Nov 2017 #52
How about KHarris (53), or JKander (36) leanforward Nov 2017 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Im not voting for Hillary...»Reply #5