Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)

2. it isn't the signed document

Reply to JCannon (Original post)

Fri Nov 3, 2017, 01:05 PM

Nov 2017

it would be SO EASY to show the actual signed document.

But they aren't showing that, because it would confirm what Donna saw.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FINAL proof that Donna Brazile is lying. [View all] JCannon Nov 2017 OP

Oooh shit shenmue Nov 2017 #1

Title is misleading. There is no "Final Proof" here onit2day Nov 2017 #26

it isn't the signed document virtualobserver Nov 2017 #2

I'd like to see a scan of the signed document... JCannon Nov 2017 #5

She was head of the DNC when she reviewed the document. virtualobserver Nov 2017 #6

Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #9

Thank you for making that clear.What we want to be true doesn't make it so onit2day Nov 2017 #21

I'm not sure that's true More_Cowbell Nov 2017 #31

Wow robersl Nov 2017 #24

Thisis as good a place as any to insert this thread: Capn Sunshine Nov 2017 #22

Donna Brazille tried, poorly, to create a controversey. joshcryer Nov 2017 #3

easy to prove that it is wrong....Hillary or the DNC could release the document virtualobserver Nov 2017 #7

Or Brazile could, or Politico, or her publisher Hatchette More_Cowbell Nov 2017 #13

You've judged it before reading it. Says more about you than it onit2day Nov 2017 #23

The exerpt alone is libel. joshcryer Nov 2017 #25

Far from final proof, but I, like most, really want to see the signed 2015 doc. aikoaiko Nov 2017 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Pepsidog Nov 2017 #8

FYI: DU standard doesn't usually permit use of the P-word except in relation to Trump's behavior... Hekate Nov 2017 #15

Thank you. n/t. whathehell Nov 2017 #19

Makes sense- sorry know for next time Pepsidog Nov 2017 #33

Ditto! BigmanPigman Nov 2017 #16

I can't believe you said that.We should never suppress the truth onit2day Nov 2017 #27

Just what is Brazile up to here? Texin Nov 2017 #10

From personal knowledge I can contradict you on one point Jim Lane Nov 2017 #11

LOL, all that and it's still complete conspiracy to get to your conclusions. R B Garr Nov 2017 #30

I've known some crackpot attorneys over the years. OilemFirchen Nov 2017 #35

Yeah, and look how the "facts" are applied based on who harms their favorite R B Garr Nov 2017 #38

As another attorney - I was about to say the same thing about the FINAL comment Ms. Toad Nov 2017 #36

People know that HRC won't get in the mud with them. She is too resilient for that. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #12

Welcome to DU, JCannon! calimary Nov 2017 #14

Wowza, tell us how you really feel, calimary Hekate Nov 2017 #17

She's trying to sell books. Mr.Bill Nov 2017 #20

I always got the feeling she treasured her insider status above all else. Demit Nov 2017 #32

Trashing another 2016 primary thread SCantiGOP Nov 2017 #18

Well, I'm convinced. progressoid Nov 2017 #28

I want to directly hear from Donna herself on this. I have admired her as a Dem leader, CNN commen- iluvtennis Nov 2017 #29

Easy MaryMagdaline Nov 2017 #34

And they just repeated the lies on Hardball as if they were fact. StevieM Nov 2017 #37