Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Feinstein won't be beaten in the primary...but there's a good chance THIS could happen: [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)33. I've told you repeatedly that you're wrong...
13. That's why you do it.
No it's not. It's only how you happen to incorrectly interpret it. I've told you repeatedly that you're wrong, but you refuse to listen. It's just a friendly wave. It saddens me that you can't accept my friendly gesture at face value. But, that's your choice. It's now all on you. Not my fault. No longer my problem.
It's a sign of a "go away, small child!" attitude.
It's a sign of something, but it ain't that. I've asked you over and over again what your issue is with me.
I've answered your question over and over again. You just don't like the answer, so you keep asking in the hopes that I'll say something different.
My own children used to play that game with me as well... but they quickly learned that I was smarter than they were giving me credit for... they grew tired of the game and they stopped trying. I strongly urge you to cease as well.
I don't damage the party.
Who said you did? I don't attack Democratic politicians.
LOL! Really? I loyally and enthusiastically campaigned for the ticket.
So what? Who said you didn't? It's irrelevant. That's not what we're talking about. What good purpose does it serve to keep saying that... completely out of the blue... apropos of nothing? It's the same as if I were to mention to you, for no particular reason, every time I replied to you: "I can recite the alphabet backwards from Z to A." --- Why would you care? Why would I mention it if that wasn't the subject matter at hand? Why would I bring it up EVERY DAY, EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE? Who cares?
What do you want from me?
Well, that's a bit presumptuous, isn't it? What makes you think I want anything at all from you? Rest assured that there's nothing I want from you. Don't worry.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Feinstein won't be beaten in the primary...but there's a good chance THIS could happen: [View all]
Ken Burch
Nov 2017
OP
if the choice is two dems you vote for the best available according to your views nt
msongs
Nov 2017
#3
One of them is a powerful Senator who can help us fight Trump ...the other will be a useless newbie.
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#25
I made a small number of comments about her during the presidential primaries.
Ken Burch
Nov 2017
#35
That doesn't mean it never happened. You can't erase the past. You can't ignore facts...
NurseJackie
Nov 2017
#36
What I actually said in the exchange just there was "I DON'T attack Democratic politicians"
Ken Burch
Nov 2017
#43
I'm telling the truth, I've never ever tried to deceive you. I'm about the truth.
Ken Burch
Nov 2017
#46
No, you don't need to be congratulating me. But it is time to let it go and move on.
Ken Burch
Nov 2017
#48
How do you feel about people who deny the truth about things that acutally happened?
NurseJackie
Nov 2017
#70
Snark is the rule, not the exception....gonna have to get used to it, sorry to say.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2017
#32
And surely the Dodgers would have won the World Series if Fernando Valenzuela was pitching
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Nov 2017
#10
If we don't it will be on those that insist on purity and are attacking Democrats instead of
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#26
I will go against primaries in 2017 and 18...all resources should be used to unseat Republicans...it
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#27
I'd still rather have Feinstein and her experience and her SENIORITY on committees, thanks.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#17
Untrue...it matters tremendously to have experienced Senators like Feinstien who
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#30
there is nothing wrong with healthy competition. our elected officals should have to
Takket
Nov 2017
#21
In the age of Trump and total GOP control primaries are foolish and useless.
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#31
There no such guarantee...and if a Gop is on the ballot with a weakened Feinstein, we could lose
Demsrule86
Nov 2017
#24
Republicans will gang up against Feinstein because her power is such a threat to them.
L. Coyote
Nov 2017
#49