General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald's political views are consistent [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...an infiltrator or ousted very quickly. Hell, I even got in trouble for telling people Bush was acting on the old UN resolutions because we were still enforcing the NFZ (this was misinterpreted as advocacy for Bush but it was 100% not; people didn't think Bush would go unilaterally, and I was saying that he would and I was right).
Some on DU were and still are for Afghanistan. I am not, and in fact, during the primaries I lamented that the two leaders were going to escalate in Afghanistan. I am against Obama's targeted killing, and targeted killing all the way.
But what can I do? I have no options. The least I can do is be consistent.
As far as Greenwald, this was a big problem for me. I saw people throw Juan Cole under the bus for much less (he said he supported the troops when we invaded Iraq, but was 100% against it at the time and outspoken for it). And Greenwald here is using the very tired excuse that he was "misled." Bullshit, anyone informed should've known that. Hell, I should just shut up now because it is a very emotional thing for me. I frankly wish I never saw this because everything he writes will now be judged based on his inadequate attention to detail over Bush. If he couldn't be trusted to observe the truth then, when the country was having a radical crisis, how can he now?