General Discussion

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)

23. I assume she believed a year after the election people have moved on.

Sat Nov 4, 2017, 05:42 PM

Nov 2017

She assumed wrong. She has a political tin ear, because everything she said about this non-existent rigging, the right-wing is parroting and that's leading to more discord in the party AND giving thuglicans and tReasonous tRump fake talking points for DAYS. She's helping the ruskie bots spread lies. Maybe she considers herself a ruskie bot She's on Faux Noose, and they spread nothing but lies concerning that uranium deal as it relates to Clinton and well, everything else. Faux Noose STAYS caping for racist, sexist, ignorant tReasonous tRump who is guilty of treason, collusion, money-laundering and so much more.

She's cutting own her throat, and what credibility she had is gone.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is Donna Brazile's agenda? [View all] SummerSnow Nov 2017 OP

Selling her book. PSPS Nov 2017 #1

and generally getting a paycheck... renegade000 Nov 2017 #3

If she was on Fox rufus dog Nov 2017 #22

sell book, make gazillions (she thinks) . Why is she seeking revenge. trueblue2007 Nov 2017 #19

To be a Fox contributor (as someone else stated). LisaM Nov 2017 #2

Making money. Plus revenge for her bad publicity with the debate question thing. n/t pnwmom Nov 2017 #4

Sell her book and to hell with the consequences. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2017 #5

Book$$$, then $$$ as a talking head 4139 Nov 2017 #6

I wonder if there isn't bad blood between her and Clinton from the past. jalan48 Nov 2017 #7

Of course there is - the 2000 Gore campaign. nt DURHAM D Nov 2017 #9

Thanks-I hadn't heard this. It's odd she was chosen as interim chair in this case. jalan48 Nov 2017 #11

Ironic that the charge is HRC controlled them, isn't it? WTF? bettyellen Nov 2017 #27

Yep-makes you wonder who is in charge. jalan48 Nov 2017 #38

I thought Gore's daughter ran that campaign. applegrove Nov 2017 #53

Sell books, obviously DrDan Nov 2017 #8

Bill O'Riley's old chair at Fox. nt DURHAM D Nov 2017 #10

All of the above. EOM elfin Nov 2017 #12

Money....always money beachbum bob Nov 2017 #13

To be trending on Twitter Not Ruth Nov 2017 #14

I think she wants to help fix the Democratic party. And it won't get fixed if nobody knows what Calista241 Nov 2017 #15

Thing is .... LenaBaby61 Nov 2017 #20

The states didnt get screwed ismnotwasm Nov 2017 #21

States didn't get screwed emulatorloo Nov 2017 #26

Donna lied, for fucks sake. bettyellen Nov 2017 #28

That's not what happened. lapucelle Nov 2017 #33

You are very misinformed, and that's part of the problem here. moriah Nov 2017 #37

The info in Brazile's book is wrong about the funding. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #48

Like this? BainsBane Nov 2017 #51

self-criticism is necessary Puzzledtraveller Nov 2017 #54

Carlista, how can you fall for this BS? louis c Nov 2017 #59

Your main concerns are not based on facts. You should stop spreading her falsehoods. Squinch Nov 2017 #79

LOL BannonsLiver Nov 2017 #82

Donna Brazile HopeAgain Nov 2017 #16

I think she was really isolated and waist deep in Russian disinformation that ecstatic Nov 2017 #17

I assume she believed a year after the election people have moved on lovemydogs Nov 2017 #18

I assume she believed a year after the election people have moved on. LenaBaby61 Nov 2017 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author WinkyDink Nov 2017 #31

Selling books Turbineguy Nov 2017 #24

My 3 cents... pure speculation here... Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #25

This depresses me so much- because it sounds like the correct answer to me. bettyellen Nov 2017 #30

I admit. I've been depressed about it all day.. Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #32

You and me both. smirkymonkey Nov 2017 #88

TOS violation? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #34

I repeatedly said it was speculation Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #36

'I repeatedly said it was speculation' melman Nov 2017 #42

If you don't like my speculation Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #49

No melman Nov 2017 #55

It's not a conspiracy. Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #62

How is that a conspiracy? melman Nov 2017 #64

I don't think it's secret Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #65

You posted it. You defend it. Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #58

I have not fractured anything Tavarious Jackson Nov 2017 #63

There are intractable right-wing authoritarians sharpening their knives. Who cares about Bernie? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #72

I agree, Donna's backing the Our Revolution horse in the next race. betsuni Nov 2017 #35

You realize how this sounds, right? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #44

The constant attacks on Democrats aren't imaginary. betsuni Nov 2017 #47

Before we go any further - Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #50

Are you missing betsuni's point? She/he's referring to the "Our Revolution" ilk as thinking... brush Nov 2017 #57

Thats possible - and I hope so. Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #60

Plausible. they see Dems as more the enemy than delisen Nov 2017 #41

Plausible my eye. Its gossipy fiction based on an alternative universe. Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #46

No, not gossipy fiction. Look at EVERY statement made by Our Revolution, or the candidate of choice Squinch Nov 2017 #80

Do you think OurRev sees Democrats as worse than the Russians (as stated above)? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #81

Why don't you have that conversation with the person who said it? And the idea that Squinch Nov 2017 #83

You mad, bro? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #84

The DEMOCRATS never lost my help. It's pompous of you to suggest otherwise. Squinch Nov 2017 #85

Emotions dont win in an exchange of ideas. Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #86

And your snide deflection and willingness to support the trashing of Democrats says it all. Squinch Nov 2017 #87

Its the old when did you stop beating wife? strategy, eh? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #89

Why do you bring up beating your wife? Squinch Nov 2017 #90

"it's going to get ugly and democrats better not refrain and get just as ugly or more" .99center Nov 2017 #45

I think you could be right fallrey Nov 2017 #66

Yup. Tad Devine & Paul Manafort ran the same type of smear campaign Wwcd Nov 2017 #69

Anyone who thinks Bernie is going to run in 2020 is deluded loyalsister Nov 2017 #74

+1, he will face the biggest dem base backlash if he ran in 2020 uponit7771 Nov 2017 #75

This message was self-deleted by its author WinkyDink Nov 2017 #29

... jpak Nov 2017 #39

Easypeasy: $$$$$$$ ananda Nov 2017 #40

I think she's been put up to it Puzzledtraveller Nov 2017 #43

$$$$$$$$$ Lunabell Nov 2017 #52

Anyone who buys a book from this taitor... louis c Nov 2017 #56

$$$ and attention Lithos Nov 2017 #61

MONEY MFM008 Nov 2017 #67

For one, it sounds like she's trying to muddy the waters if Biden chooses to run, woodsprite Nov 2017 #68

If it's to fuck shit up royally, she has achieved her goal. VOX Nov 2017 #70

To sell her book and hopefully earn enough to retire Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2017 #71

Well, SummerSnow? Is there anything youd like to contribute? Duncan Grant Nov 2017 #73

Money from book sales. onecaliberal Nov 2017 #76

setting up her defense for when the Mueller investigation heads her way. underthematrix Nov 2017 #77

What is Paul Manafort's agenda? nt greyl Nov 2017 #78

She doesnt want to be treated as a slave tavernier Nov 2017 #91

Bit of revenge for having been ridden hard w/ no pay off... Baconator Nov 2017 #92