Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mopinko

(73,732 posts)

9. iirc, someone involved in forming raw story was a member back in the day.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Sun Nov 5, 2017, 06:55 PM

Nov 2017

only recall this vaguely, and suspect the brain trust will recall more.
my recollection is that there was some strum und drang about the site, and the writer, and it was fairly intense.

that said, i rarely link to raw story and like others say, look for the actual content.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's your chance to weigh in on the great Raw Story debate [View all] Miles Archer Nov 2017 OP

It is getting bad Twitler Nov 2017 #1

Raw Story provides a synopsis for those that don't subscribe to the WaPo LeftInTX Nov 2017 #2

It's crap and why anyone relies on it is beyond me. WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2017 #3

I prefer the primary source article rather than Raw Story Metatron Nov 2017 #4

Raw story gives a decent synopsis and links... The Polack MSgt Nov 2017 #5

Raw Story has one of the best moderated comment sections on the net MrScorpio Nov 2017 #6

I am looking at all sources and checking at these sites pbmus Nov 2017 #7

Raw story is still fairly good, IMO Nevernose Nov 2017 #8

iirc, someone involved in forming raw story was a member back in the day. mopinko Nov 2017 #9