Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rose McGowan Rips 'Sooo Liberal' 'Scum Bucket' Alec Baldwin [View all]Dr. Strange
(26,058 posts)63. If Weinstein bears full and exclusive responsibility, then why is Baldwin being blamed?
I'm fine with laying off of McGowan, except if she's going to blame Baldwin because
he wants to protect rapists
then her actions (or lack thereof) would seem to be fair game. Unless Baldwin has done something that we're not being told about?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not generally to the point of gaybashing random strangers in the streets, though.
Ken Burch
Nov 2017
#35
It's irrational to believe temperament is indicative of political motivations.
LanternWaste
Nov 2017
#52
How about I continue supporting Baldwin's statement about this incident.
bathroommonkey76
Nov 2017
#45
THAT! It's not "blaming the victim" to point out that her settlement allowed Weinstein to
coolsandy
Nov 2017
#55
Considering how many women have accused him of various things, "carefully" isn't the word I would
LisaL
Nov 2017
#29
If Weinstein bears full and exclusive responsibility, then why is Baldwin being blamed?
Dr. Strange
Nov 2017
#63
Whether correct or wrong, Rose McGowan loses the argument when she starts tweeting like Trump
Pachamama
Nov 2017
#26