Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(404 posts)

16. I have no idea what you are saying.

Mon Nov 6, 2017, 12:31 PM

Nov 2017

Non-essential people do NOT need to have guns. What's the confusion??

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Today's Shooting Already Has Wikipedia Page, But It's TOO SOON To Discuss Gun Violence [View all] SoCalMusicLover Nov 2017 OP

Never too early. Ban ALL GUNS from ALL NON-ESSENTIAL PEOPLE...NOW! Fluke a Snooker Nov 2017 #1

We have a right to bear arms. Chemisse Nov 2017 #4

The ONLY sensible control is TOTAL control Fluke a Snooker Nov 2017 #14

I have no problem killing criminals who want to kill progressives Fluke a Snooker Nov 2017 #15

We have non-essential people? Igel Nov 2017 #6

I have no idea what you are saying. Fluke a Snooker Nov 2017 #16

This is what Republicans THINK that Democrats want to do. n/t Chemisse Nov 2017 #10

And what's your point? Fluke a Snooker Nov 2017 #17

Sounds great sarisataka Nov 2017 #11

It appears there is another church shooting, in CA. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2017 #2

Yep, guy kills estranged wife: dalton99a Nov 2017 #3

A spousal murder/suicide. Seems almost "normal" in these times. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2017 #7

All of those "thoughts & prayers" RWers... MountCleaners Nov 2017 #8

yep brettdale Nov 2017 #12

remember to send thoughts and prayers 0rganism Nov 2017 #9

You mean we have to wait longer than the 26 minutes Ms. Toad Nov 2017 #13