Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

applegrove

(133,198 posts)

6. This article is against dynastic wealth. Reread. Neither Moyers or Huffington

Reply to Hortensis (Reply #5)

Mon Nov 6, 2017, 09:34 PM

Nov 2017

Post are right wing and they both posted this article. Think of it like a knell to those who support the right on who really is favoured in the tax cuts and it is not the worker. Just because an article does not have all the Democratic bells and whistles does not mean it is pro right wing. We need to appeal to people who are workers and don't understand the Democratic bubble words. The language here is neutral. The message is Democratic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The GOP Tax Plan Tells Us Everything About Who Matters In American Democracy [View all] applegrove Nov 2017 OP

Maybe take Democrat-bashing equalization to a right-wing forum? Hortensis Nov 2017 #1

I had a caption of an photo of Donald Trumpin by mistake. Please reread. It is not a right applegrove Nov 2017 #2

Nice response to my frustration, thanks. This publication's Hortensis Nov 2017 #3

I think you misread. It is implying that the rich are being favoured. And that applegrove Nov 2017 #4

I did NOT misread the headline. And neither did anyone else. Hortensis Nov 2017 #5

This article is against dynastic wealth. Reread. Neither Moyers or Huffington applegrove Nov 2017 #6