That pisses me off. We would pay this rich piece of shit's (Weinsteins) legal bills too'
..."And they've tried to make much of this battle about Weinstein himself, labeling him a "California health care CEO" and criticizing the way AHF raises hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue by buying pharmaceuticals at a discount and reselling them. And for using his large, powerful organization to wage political and legal battles.
"He's not on your side," one ad states bluntly"
This guy uses an aids foundation to by pharmaceuticals and then resell them for profit...
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2017/08/post_68.html
https://www.noonissue2.org/about/?source=g_54998747904-229764810409&utm_source=g&utm_medium=ads&utm_content=229764810409&utm_term=54998747904
"Experts say the measure would lead to more red tape and government bureaucracy. Why? The ballot issue contains no language guiding implementation, and the issue’s sponsors slipped in an unprecedented provision giving them a blank check to intervene—at taxpayer expense—in any legal challenges that may arise if the issue becomes law."
Read the Bill...it sucks Sen. Sander should read it more carefully.
https://www.sos.state.oh.us/globalassets/ballotboard/2017/2017-08-17-certifiedballotlanguageissue2.pdf
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read