Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer. [View all]aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)6. Except that gun ownership rates among Americans are historically low.
Yes, we have a lot of guns in our society, but they are in the hands of fewer and fewer Americans.
Only about 30-35% of households nationally have firearms according to self-reports (granted which may be due to underreporting).
Almost all of these mass shooters are using only 1 - 3 guns to commit their crimes (the LV shooting is a notable exception). Having 10, 30, 100 ARs isn't relevant to mass shootings.
If its true that mass shootings are increasing and gun ownership rates are decreasing, then the NYT is full of shit.
Something else is going on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer. [View all]
Cattledog
Nov 2017
OP
"GunFacts" is a major NRA propaganda site, so I take their stats with a grain of salt.
Cattledog
Nov 2017
#16
In developed industrialized countries with more or less stable governments
Crunchy Frog
Nov 2017
#22
IMO nothing else is going on. Those who get/have access to guns are the demographic segment...
brush
Nov 2017
#11
So you're saying that a type of person who didn't own guns in the past are now buying guns...
aikoaiko
Nov 2017
#14
Yes, because more people had guns in the past but there were fewer mass shootings.
aikoaiko
Nov 2017
#17
Seems flawed. Millions more people now, millions more guns, millions more with multiple guns.
brush
Nov 2017
#36
As the FBI does not defines mass shooting, I question the credibility of your narrative
Not Ruth
Nov 2017
#41