General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The youngest victims were 6 yrs old and 3 mos old? [View all]scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)"It is unlawful to leave a child unattended in a vehicle"
The simple fact that a casino feels the need for such a sign... That some parents have to be told that you have to give up your gambling fix if you can't find a babysitter.. Is an indictment on our society.
When you have young kids, YES you have to give up on some conveniences as fun if you can't find a baby sitter.
Taking a 6 year old to a violent movie at midnight is parental neglect.
Taking a 3 month old to ANY movie is insensitive to the other patrons. If the baby cries, you disrupt those around you. If you need to get up to take care of the baby during the nearly 3 hours running time of the movie, you disrupt those around you.
If you can't find a babysitter, then you stay home. It is called being a responsible parent and consideration for other people.
I have two children, both in their teens now. When they were infants, we gave up being able to do certain things when we couldn't find a sitter. That's life. When they were 6, they weren't being exposed to PG13 violent action movies.. Their brains aren't ready to process that yet. That borders on parental negligence.
No .. Parents shouldn't have to worry about being shot at when they go out to a movie with their kids... But there is no good excuse for taking a 6 year old or 3 month old to a midnight premier of a loud PG13 action movie. None.