Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The youngest victims were 6 yrs old and 3 mos old? [View all]LynneSin
(95,337 posts)43. So those for everyone else in the movie theater we just have to deal with it?
There is NO reason to take an infant to a midnight movie ESPECIALLY one where it's pretty much assumed to be packed to the hilt with patrons.
This was not a one-time-only showing of the movie. Perhaps if it was the Led Zeppelin 02 concert in 2007 that could be justification taking an infant because you know it's probably the last time the band will ever do a concert together. That Batman movie will be in the theater for months.
I've been to theaters where they would have turned the couple away. Why should all the other movie patrons have to suffer because of poor parenting choices of a few.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Many infants sleep right through all sorts of things. If new parents feel they can get out and
Brickbat
Jul 2012
#1
If parents have a baby that sleeps well and is generally placid, and who are responsible enough to
Brickbat
Jul 2012
#45
Some people don't like to let the fact of having children impinge on their
TwilightGardener
Jul 2012
#3
Yep. We did take our first infant to a restaurant a few times, but he stopped sleeping through
TwilightGardener
Jul 2012
#17
Yeah, the stupid fuckers should have known that the theater would become a free fire zone!
11 Bravo
Jul 2012
#63
They had a reasonable expectation not to have their children shot up at a movie theater
Ed Suspicious
Jul 2012
#51
I think the consequence (child being shot) far outweighs the infraction (taking child to a movie)
cyberswede
Jul 2012
#44
WTF? The lesson that they shouldn't take their kids anywhere a maniac might shoot them.
morningfog
Jul 2012
#30
What role does desensitization to violence at a very young age play in these kinds of crimes?
Romulox
Jul 2012
#25
At 6, I never lived in a such a dark world. My batman had "ZOW!" bubbles. I don't think I could've
Romulox
Jul 2012
#37
I believe the noise would be louder for a movie like Batman than for a cartoon.
proud2BlibKansan
Jul 2012
#48
at a casino near where I live, there are signs on each floor of the parking garages that read...
scheming daemons
Jul 2012
#38
This thread is violence against rational thought. I wouldn't let MY six year old in here. n/t
Ed Suspicious
Jul 2012
#52
I can't in good conscience, pretend I have enough relevant information to know
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#54
why should parents be inconvenienced by having small children? sigh...
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#61
Whatever. I took my kids out to a late night Harry Potter showing because we thought it would be
Ed Suspicious
Jul 2012
#64