Man who opened fire on Texas church shooter hailed as 'good Samaritan'

[Lee-Lee]

82. How to you judge the weight of the evidence to be such

When the following seems to be true-

His actual intended targets were not at the church- so he had not accomplished what he seemingly was out to do.

When he left the church he fired shots at a neighbor who wasn’t in the church and wasn’t affiliated with it but who had out working on his car. If he was “finished” why would he do that? That was just moments before the armed citizen fired at him.

In fact the weight of the evidence suggests nothing about him being done at that point. His firing at the neighbor and his attempt to flea at high speed and escape instead of just killing himself right away both indicate the opposite, that he wanted to do more. He killed himself only when he couldn’t escape from his pursuers.

I get that some of you are desperate for this narrative of “he didn’t save anybody” to be true because if it’s true it conflicts with what you want to believe, but twisting things to claim that nobody was saved just makes you look very petty and sad that you can’t even acknowledge that this person in fact most likely did save lives just because you are more worried about the political aspects of it being true than what the truth actually is.