Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,097 posts)

8. Yes, as stated above, the law indicates that Moore's name would remain on the ballot

Thu Nov 9, 2017, 04:53 PM

Nov 2017

but if he withdraws any votes for him would not be certified (so none of his votes would count)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Law says Roy Moore cannot be replaced on December ballot [View all] underpants Nov 2017 OP

write in? nt msongs Nov 2017 #1

That would require voters who can write. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #9

Thanks More_Cowbell Nov 2017 #2

The timing of this story is ultra-bad for old Roy gratuitous Nov 2017 #3

True Stuckinthebush Nov 2017 #6

Stupid rethuglican base rusty fender Nov 2017 #11

Yes that seems to the consensus underpants Nov 2017 #14