General Discussion

moriah

(8,312 posts)

39. She does have a point. Everything released in the hack was anti-HRC.

Fri Nov 10, 2017, 11:37 AM

Nov 2017

If Sanders and O'Malley confirm, it just means she was equal opportunity in her journalistic integrity issues at least.

And it does answer a question I had. I didn't understand how someone could go from "helping HRC cheat" to feeling the need to "find the cancer" and put on Gospel to tell Bernie about a JFA that didn't bother him and she didn't understand fully.

I honestly suspected that she likely did feed debate questions to all three. Doesn't make it much better of form, because she shouldn't have done it at all -- I want to see candidates think on their feet -- but I can believe this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, Donna says she also gave debate questions to both Sanders and O'Malley [View all] boston bean Nov 2017 OP

She is an idiot BeyondGeography Nov 2017 #1

+1 grantcart Nov 2017 #74

I say.... FarPoint Nov 2017 #2

Yup, buh-bye Donna. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #28

If true, she's revealing that her own ethics are completely shoddy True Dough Nov 2017 #3

Shady that neither of those men admitted as much when HRC was being skewered over it.... bettyellen Nov 2017 #4

And it would have really helped her at that point. Sanders and O'Malley could have shut down StevieM Nov 2017 #10

Sanders had the opportunity all through the campaign to clear that up. ehrnst Nov 2017 #15

Exactly. MrsCoffee Nov 2017 #31

That's What I Was Thinking Me. Nov 2017 #37

It is not within his character to do so. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #42

Bernie was silent when Hillary was getting lit up SirBrockington Nov 2017 #5

We're gaining a lot of insight as to the nature of people's character, aren't we? NurseJackie Nov 2017 #8

Our having to tolerate the undermining of Democratic solidarity is a virtue that is wearing thin. LuvLoogie Nov 2017 #84

This should be a mega-story. It speaks volumes about how far we have fallen that the media will StevieM Nov 2017 #6

Wow. mercuryblues Nov 2017 #7

She's the Repubs darling now. They will make her wealthy. Alice11111 Nov 2017 #52

Bernie was silent when Hillary was getting lit up SirBrockington Nov 2017 #9

Yeah, but most Americans never heard the correction. Actually, that was how it worked with Comey StevieM Nov 2017 #11

And many refused to believe any corrections to smears of Hillary ehrnst Nov 2017 #20

He was and is silent on many many things that didn't fit the narrative he presented. (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #14

Including His Tax Returns Me. Nov 2017 #38

Has he released the ones after 2014? ehrnst Nov 2017 #55

As If Me. Nov 2017 #56

That doesn't support what a lot of the anti-Hillary chatter says ehrnst Nov 2017 #12

I think she needs a full neurological work-up /eom hopeforchange2008 Nov 2017 #13

Clinton truly did get ratfucked. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #16

Ratfucked by those who knew this and stayed silent when Hillary was being pilloried ehrnst Nov 2017 #21

+1 nt NCTraveler Nov 2017 #23

Yes ismnotwasm Nov 2017 #82

So, Donna, why wait until now to say this? Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #17

That's the $64,000 question. She had multiple speaking engagements and stayed silent? Why? TheBlackAdder Nov 2017 #89

Holy cow...she admitted it? Who turned her in I wonder. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #18

Its time to sell books Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #27

I called the DNC and told them ...'get rid of Brazille' she is a lying backstabber. And if this is Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #19

It gave the impression that Hillary was cheating them. Why come forward? (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #22

It is disgraceful...I would not support either Sanders or O'Malley. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #24

Silence can also be Fake News. delisen Nov 2017 #26

The lie of omission. Like Wikileaks selective release of only that which could be used to ehrnst Nov 2017 #29

H Clinton-most abused politician of our times. delisen Nov 2017 #25

And if you fact checked the smears against her, you were simply an "establishment shill" ehrnst Nov 2017 #33

I see Clinton as Revolutionary-haven't always delisen Nov 2017 #34

Like Margaret Sanger and Katherine Hepburn's mother. ehrnst Nov 2017 #35

She threatens the hell out of dishonest or ignorant Repubs. Alice11111 Nov 2017 #53

But it's only a scandal with Hillary, of course mcar Nov 2017 #30

Donna has paid her dues...nt LexVegas Nov 2017 #32

Doesn't matter if she paid her dues Fresh_Start Nov 2017 #36

She does have a point. Everything released in the hack was anti-HRC. moriah Nov 2017 #39

Anyone with a working brain could have figured out what would be asked at the debate Beaverhausen Nov 2017 #40

Exactly. I don't understand why Donna would feel the need to give those questions to anyone. LisaL Nov 2017 #43

Stay with that line of thinking and see where it leads. yardwork Nov 2017 #78

Right like it was shocking they'd get questions about lead in water in fucking Flint. tammywammy Nov 2017 #86

Sanders has ran on integrity for 3 decades. Integrity would be standing up when Clinton was attacked SandyZ Nov 2017 #41

You mean like standing up against the attacks on her "damn emails"? Jim Lane Nov 2017 #85

I think it is clear what "I mean". I do not play your games. SandyZ Nov 2017 #87

Don't forget that the media was just as responsible. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #44

She was probably involved with Bush sending the debate tape to Gore. nt RandiFan1290 Nov 2017 #45

So now she's credible all of a sudden melman Nov 2017 #46

If you are looking for hypocrisy you are looking in the wrong direction. boston bean Nov 2017 #47

Like when Elizabeth Warren was a Hero for confirming that the primary was "rigged" ehrnst Nov 2017 #50

Lol! (points) You really said that! Squinch Nov 2017 #80

This message was self-deleted by its author chowder66 Nov 2017 #48

If they weren't aware before the debate, they were after. (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #54

It wasn't clear whether Hillary actually even saw the questions, anyway. LisaM Nov 2017 #58

It's pretty clear that she did NOT slip questions to Sanders and O'Malley. Jim Lane Nov 2017 #66

Her statement is ambiguous and Carlson didn't get the facts Jim Lane Nov 2017 #49

LOL @ the tortured JPR attempts to always malign Hillary. What Donna is saying is that Wikileaks R B Garr Nov 2017 #62

If you're against maligning Democrats, stop maligning Donna Brazile Jim Lane Nov 2017 #63

What a total sham, lol, I wasn't maligning Donna. Your analogies are tortured R B Garr Nov 2017 #67

As is so often the case, you respond to what I did not say. Jim Lane Nov 2017 #68

No, you're just copying me now from when I said your writings reference what R B Garr Nov 2017 #72

Things I didn't say Jim Lane Nov 2017 #75

You were "explaining nuances", and that's what you said. Based on what the R B Garr Nov 2017 #76

Yup. Tortured is a good way to put it. nt stevenleser Nov 2017 #65

Thanks. I deleted my post to minimize confusion. nt chowder66 Nov 2017 #69

lol at your pretzeled apologist post obamanut2012 Nov 2017 #70

thanks jim for being resonable questionseverything Nov 2017 #77

She has so much credibility...a mini Trump. Alice11111 Nov 2017 #51

and afterwards, Governor O'Malley said (as a reminder,) 2016 Is 'Not a Slam Dunk.' elleng Nov 2017 #57

Enough with this hiding the debates thing. I live on the West Coast. LisaM Nov 2017 #59

Sorry about that, elleng Nov 2017 #60

Most people are home Sunday nights. That's by far the best time. LisaM Nov 2017 #61

we must never again give the repubs a 3 month headstart debating questionseverything Nov 2017 #79

I completely agree, and I'll add that it goes beyond the free airtime Jim Lane Nov 2017 #83

agreed questionseverything Nov 2017 #88

Jesus Christ. joshcryer Nov 2017 #64

So Hillary DID rig the primaries Nevernose Nov 2017 #71

This must be why Tad Devine defended Brazile. n/t seaglass Nov 2017 #73

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #81