General Discussion

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)

138. I can't say what you need so many weapons for, I fear what you think you need to do with them

Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:25 PM

Jul 2012

I fear the day when you feel it is time to use your stockpile.

As for how many? That is a question you need to ask a professional used to dealing with hoarding conditions (or paranoia in many cases of weapons stock-pilling).

How many pizza boxes and old soda jugs in a one room apartment is evidence of a mental disorder? not my specialty, but at a point it becomes apparent there is a problem, ofttimes filling the entire apartment is considered a symptom.

Stockpiling over a hundred weapons is cause for concern, do you planning on arming a large cell or are you a loner that is quiet and keeps to himself, I am not sure if I am dealing with a Karesh or a militant loner.

It is not normal dude, it is rather scary, it is extremely dangerous to your community for a member to stockpile so many weapons.

What do you think you need to prepare so obsessively for? Are you a survivalist or something?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

168 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

if this guy walked into a theater loaded with knives only... [View all] scheming daemons Jul 2012 OP

KNR joeybee12 Jul 2012 #1

Here they come Kingofalldems Jul 2012 #2

LOL! Jeff In Milwaukee Jul 2012 #91

Are you watching porn movies? nt Remmah2 Jul 2012 #93

It could be a Gallagher show. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #164

Who's telling you that where? Curtland1015 Jul 2012 #3

Don't tell me "guns don't kill people". GarroHorus Jul 2012 #4

If assault weapons werent accessible to him, at least 10 less people would be dead scheming daemons Jul 2012 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author GarroHorus Jul 2012 #6

Is the UK a police state? scheming daemons Jul 2012 #8

Only way to do that is repeal the second amendment GarroHorus Jul 2012 #11

Nope. Not even close. scheming daemons Jul 2012 #17

HAHAHAHAHAHAH! GarroHorus Jul 2012 #20

so you need a machine gun to hunt, skippy? spanone Jul 2012 #88

You don't have a fucking clue, do you? GarroHorus Jul 2012 #89

I have a clue Plucketeer Jul 2012 #113

WTF does your rant have to do with machine guns? GarroHorus Jul 2012 #114

Your "WTF" Plucketeer Jul 2012 #119

I took a billy goat down once, he chewed through the fucking rope my mom had him on snooper2 Jul 2012 #126

Repigs bongbong Jul 2012 #141

"Only way to do that is repeal the second amendment" Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #104

Hehe, you are kidding right Dokkie Jul 2012 #100

Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #102

So you're saying gun control = police state? Are you Joe the Plumber? DanTex Jul 2012 #10

Enforce the laws in place. n/t GarroHorus Jul 2012 #13

Your NRA buddies dont even allow that scheming daemons Jul 2012 #19

I am not a member of the NRA GarroHorus Jul 2012 #22

Didnt say you were. I said they were your buddies. scheming daemons Jul 2012 #27

That's a blatant lie GarroHorus Jul 2012 #30

NRA sympathizer? morningfog Jul 2012 #61

Anti-gun grabbing GarroHorus Jul 2012 #65

I don't believe you on either of those. morningfog Jul 2012 #67

I don't believe it either - he must be LibGranny Jul 2012 #86

I agree with you Plucketeer Jul 2012 #132

So if we find out this guy used a legal gun.... Walk away Jul 2012 #31

If the guy had a legal gun, he had a legal right to it GarroHorus Jul 2012 #32

Guns have nothing to do with freedom. DanTex Jul 2012 #43

Exactly. 1gobluedem Jul 2012 #72

The rebels in Lybia and Syria seem to have missed your memo. PavePusher Jul 2012 #148

So - what, if anything, would you suggest be done to prevent things like this happening? whopis01 Jul 2012 #96

Existing laws are obviously grossly insufficient. intheflow Jul 2012 #85

No, he had no automatic weapons. PavePusher Jul 2012 #150

He was wearing protective gear: intheflow Jul 2012 #168

There are gun laws? secondvariety Jul 2012 #90

There's a sarcasm smilie for that type of post... PavePusher Jul 2012 #151

Yeah, that's exactly what he's saying Scootaloo Jul 2012 #26

Assault weapons are a problem. Tennessee Gal Jul 2012 #16

+1,000,000 highplainsdem Jul 2012 #39

The AR-15 is the most popular centerfire rifle in America. Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #66

This. xmas74 Jul 2012 #83

"...the variety of weapons available for no good reason." PavePusher Jul 2012 #154

What weapons do you find acceptable? xmas74 Jul 2012 #162

One can hunt just fine (and I have done so) with AR- and AK-pattern rifles. PavePusher Jul 2012 #165

"assault weapons" are not a problem. PavePusher Jul 2012 #153

Oh piffle, we've already got a police state.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #21

I won't alert on this but to simply say "Wow! That was a stretch!" CTyankee Jul 2012 #44

I'm sure the military would join a police state Confusious Jul 2012 #52

We Don't Need to Have This Iggy Jul 2012 #64

I'm for gun rights, but I also think its worth noting that Saddam Hussein managed... D23MIURG23 Jul 2012 #94

We've already got a police state. sulphurdunn Jul 2012 #111

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!! Skittles Jul 2012 #166

This message was self-deleted by its author GarroHorus Jul 2012 #167

If you have a magic wand that can wish away the invention of the gun, be my guest. Curtland1015 Jul 2012 #12

+300,000,000 n/t GarroHorus Jul 2012 #14

Exactly. The Genie has left the bottle grahampuba Jul 2012 #82

Bad math. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #107

I'm curious whether you know what kind of guns he actually used... D23MIURG23 Jul 2012 #118

You know, using the "eyes" smiley doesn't really seem very sensitive right now. Skinner Jul 2012 #7

You know, suggesting a gun grab doesn't seem very sensitive right now. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #9

You are an extremely effective advocate for your point of view. Skinner Jul 2012 #15

+1 mac56 Jul 2012 #23

Word... SaveAmerica Jul 2012 #25

Yeah, god forbid we talk about gun policy in the wake of a mass shooting! DanTex Jul 2012 #28

Bull fucking shit. Now is the very time to talk about it. morningfog Jul 2012 #63

Thankfully, the police grabbed his guns. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #70

Must defend guns...must defend guns...while funerals are being planned. Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #120

Must grab guns...must grab guns...while funerals are being planned. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #124

Just as long as no one dear to *you* is DEAD, it's all good, right? Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #131

Guns are for killing, at least knives are built to do other things. CreekDog Jul 2012 #18

What did the 911 hijackers use? And how many are dead? KurtNYC Jul 2012 #24

Box cutters have a non lethal usage. Guns dont. scheming daemons Jul 2012 #29

Then amend the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment GarroHorus Jul 2012 #34

I don't think anyone here is named skippy... tnvoter Jul 2012 #41

It is the type of argument device they use when... scheming daemons Jul 2012 #45

i really like your take on that. barbtries Jul 2012 #50

Well yeah. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #109

Did some one call me? I hate my parents for naming me Skippy, gun nuts keep stalking me. Dragonfli Jul 2012 #133

There will be no need to amend the constitution. A Simple Game Jul 2012 #80

What's this 'skippy' business? At least twice in this thread. Kingofalldems Jul 2012 #128

Saying that mass murder can't/won't occur without guns is not true. KurtNYC Jul 2012 #46

Bombs are illegal, too. Zalatix Jul 2012 #152

Guns have lots of non-lethal purposes. PavePusher Jul 2012 #155

So I can still carry a box cutter thucythucy Jul 2012 #108

No guns were used by hijackers on 911. KurtNYC Jul 2012 #115

So you're in favor of banning box cutters and knives thucythucy Jul 2012 #123

He had four fugging guns including an AK47 rifle malaise Jul 2012 #33

That is the problem. Tennessee Gal Jul 2012 #36

For hunting JonLP24 Jul 2012 #53

The vast majority of rifles used for hunting big game are more powerful than an AK-47. Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #60

Do you think that it should be illegal to own four guns? Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #51

There should be better safeguards in place DaveJ Jul 2012 #71

Do you consider four guns an "arsenal"? Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #73

Sorry if my grammar is not good. DaveJ Jul 2012 #79

I'm not criticizing your grammar. Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #87

Over a hundred guns is an arsenal, and a symptom of mental disease, ever been on hoarders? Dragonfli Jul 2012 #134

Let's assume for the moment that you don't think that gun collecting is in and of itself Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #136

I can't say what you need so many weapons for, I fear what you think you need to do with them Dragonfli Jul 2012 #138

I find them interesting to collect, and they're great investments. Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #145

Not scary as stated, you want to be a small time arms dealer, OK, if your customers are sane. Dragonfli Jul 2012 #146

Are you asserting that only hand crafted pieces of art worth the price of a car are worthy Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #147

My uncle gave me a WWII Japanese sniper rifle he got oversees when I was twelve Dragonfli Jul 2012 #158

Guns and the legal gun running done under the guise of Second Amendment rights Skidmore Jul 2012 #35

Exactly! Tennessee Gal Jul 2012 #38

100% correct malaise Jul 2012 #40

+1000 nt Javaman Jul 2012 #55

Couldn't the same be said if everyone carried a gun in the theater? Renew Deal Jul 2012 #37

There would be multiple dead before any of them were able to grab their weapon scheming daemons Jul 2012 #42

Cite to evidence please. PavePusher Jul 2012 #156

The 4 police armed police officers murdered last year, were shot to death before they could draw. progressivebydesign Jul 2012 #160

We can start by taxing the hell out of ammo... Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #47

How many rounds of ammunition do you think citizens should be restricted to owning? Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #54

Chris Rock said it best... Javaman Jul 2012 #57

Thank you. The video of that routine is funny as hell... CTyankee Jul 2012 #68

LOL. Amen, Chris. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #75

Because someone planning on going out in a blaze of glory 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #142

thank you. barbtries Jul 2012 #48

Or... if THIS guy was in the theater, it would not have been nearly as bad... redroof Jul 2012 #49

No respose to this because they are weak and afraid RegieRocker Jul 2012 #74

Maybe yes, maybe no. The shooter was wearing a bullet proof vest thucythucy Jul 2012 #125

+1 Go Vols Jul 2012 #130

Of course guns kill people, that's why they were invented, and Brewinblue Jul 2012 #56

+1000 Right on! RC Jul 2012 #81

Wanna be in a militia? xmas74 Jul 2012 #92

Scalia Effectively Did Away With The Militia Matter...... Paladin Jul 2012 #95

Which was absolutely ridiculous. xmas74 Jul 2012 #144

BEENGO! Iggy Jul 2012 #58

Let's change the law whereby we can all carry 1 kiloton nukes. It not the nukes that kill people LiberalArkie Jul 2012 #59

I so very much agree with you. spartan61 Jul 2012 #62

Bollocks. Gun control is the left's equivalent of the right's anti-abortion insanity. Daemonaquila Jul 2012 #69

Gun control is sanity. Anti-abortion is insanity. BTW, this is not a RW site. nt valerief Jul 2012 #77

I agree. NS2012 Jul 2012 #78

Um, no... Hissyspit Jul 2012 #106

Bingo! nt valerief Jul 2012 #76

And if this guy walked in with a bomb or two, MadHound Jul 2012 #84

Finally davidthegnome Jul 2012 #98

Realizing that it's a societal problem should lead us to more important decisions than gun regulatio reformist2 Jul 2012 #112

However, to continue your analogy - GaYellowDawg Jul 2012 #157

I agree it's about the guns. Guns kill because assholes fetishize them flamingdem Jul 2012 #97

Oh BS. Guns kill because a certain subset of disturbed people get them. D23MIURG23 Jul 2012 #110

Guns kill because of social tolerance of gun loving, it's stylish and macho to have guns flamingdem Jul 2012 #116

Your pop psychology analysis doesn't merit much of a response beyond "citation needed" n/t D23MIURG23 Jul 2012 #121

It's what I see everyday in the society I live in - now we see the results flamingdem Jul 2012 #122

Of course, and no one needs to take your assertions seriously. D23MIURG23 Jul 2012 #139

You are correct. Chorophyll Jul 2012 #99

Or a pipe bomb, or ricin, or etc., etc.,... NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #101

What kind of gun did Timothy McVeigh use? Edweird Jul 2012 #103

Mass murder by other than gun: Remmah2 Jul 2012 #105

And if Aerows Jul 2012 #117

If he wanted to mass murder and couldn't get guns Mayflower1 Jul 2012 #127

Or only a meat thermometer... pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #129

Mentally ill people kill people. More affordable, accessible, non-stigmatic mental uppityperson Jul 2012 #135

Or he could've been loaded with explosives and killed even more. It isn't the gun, it's the shooter Lionessa Jul 2012 #137

Or if he had a car and fertilizer 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #140

Bottom line: The GOP and the 2nd amendment need to be destroyed BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #143

You are, of course, incorrect. PavePusher Jul 2012 #149

I call guns "weapons of fast destruction." progressivebydesign Jul 2012 #159

People kill people with guns. We don't know this guy's motivation yet but Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #161

95% of homicides scenes are single victim. krispos42 Jul 2012 #163