General Discussion

R B Garr

(17,969 posts)

76. You were "explaining nuances", and that's what you said. Based on what the

Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:35 PM

Nov 2017

judge didn't say, you took that as encouragement for the plaintiff's to resubmit their case. All of this goes to a quest to legitimize anything Bernie related and it's just a way to create a false universe/reality.

Donna is by all accounts an "establishment" Democrat, so the sudden interest in her truthfulness is only in proportion to what she says to support the notion that the primary was rigged against Bernie. I haven't seen the Bernie people so enamored of a DNC democrat like they are currently with Donna and her book. So it sticks out like a sore thumb that you would now call into question her truthfulness when she says she also helped Bernie.

You don't get to recreate reality that we've all lived the past couple years. It's very divisive.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, Donna says she also gave debate questions to both Sanders and O'Malley [View all] boston bean Nov 2017 OP

She is an idiot BeyondGeography Nov 2017 #1

+1 grantcart Nov 2017 #74

I say.... FarPoint Nov 2017 #2

Yup, buh-bye Donna. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #28

If true, she's revealing that her own ethics are completely shoddy True Dough Nov 2017 #3

Shady that neither of those men admitted as much when HRC was being skewered over it.... bettyellen Nov 2017 #4

And it would have really helped her at that point. Sanders and O'Malley could have shut down StevieM Nov 2017 #10

Sanders had the opportunity all through the campaign to clear that up. ehrnst Nov 2017 #15

Exactly. MrsCoffee Nov 2017 #31

That's What I Was Thinking Me. Nov 2017 #37

It is not within his character to do so. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #42

Bernie was silent when Hillary was getting lit up SirBrockington Nov 2017 #5

We're gaining a lot of insight as to the nature of people's character, aren't we? NurseJackie Nov 2017 #8

Our having to tolerate the undermining of Democratic solidarity is a virtue that is wearing thin. LuvLoogie Nov 2017 #84

This should be a mega-story. It speaks volumes about how far we have fallen that the media will StevieM Nov 2017 #6

Wow. mercuryblues Nov 2017 #7

She's the Repubs darling now. They will make her wealthy. Alice11111 Nov 2017 #52

Bernie was silent when Hillary was getting lit up SirBrockington Nov 2017 #9

Yeah, but most Americans never heard the correction. Actually, that was how it worked with Comey StevieM Nov 2017 #11

And many refused to believe any corrections to smears of Hillary ehrnst Nov 2017 #20

He was and is silent on many many things that didn't fit the narrative he presented. (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #14

Including His Tax Returns Me. Nov 2017 #38

Has he released the ones after 2014? ehrnst Nov 2017 #55

As If Me. Nov 2017 #56

That doesn't support what a lot of the anti-Hillary chatter says ehrnst Nov 2017 #12

I think she needs a full neurological work-up /eom hopeforchange2008 Nov 2017 #13

Clinton truly did get ratfucked. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #16

Ratfucked by those who knew this and stayed silent when Hillary was being pilloried ehrnst Nov 2017 #21

+1 nt NCTraveler Nov 2017 #23

Yes ismnotwasm Nov 2017 #82

So, Donna, why wait until now to say this? Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #17

That's the $64,000 question. She had multiple speaking engagements and stayed silent? Why? TheBlackAdder Nov 2017 #89

Holy cow...she admitted it? Who turned her in I wonder. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #18

Its time to sell books Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #27

I called the DNC and told them ...'get rid of Brazille' she is a lying backstabber. And if this is Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #19

It gave the impression that Hillary was cheating them. Why come forward? (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #22

It is disgraceful...I would not support either Sanders or O'Malley. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #24

Silence can also be Fake News. delisen Nov 2017 #26

The lie of omission. Like Wikileaks selective release of only that which could be used to ehrnst Nov 2017 #29

H Clinton-most abused politician of our times. delisen Nov 2017 #25

And if you fact checked the smears against her, you were simply an "establishment shill" ehrnst Nov 2017 #33

I see Clinton as Revolutionary-haven't always delisen Nov 2017 #34

Like Margaret Sanger and Katherine Hepburn's mother. ehrnst Nov 2017 #35

She threatens the hell out of dishonest or ignorant Repubs. Alice11111 Nov 2017 #53

But it's only a scandal with Hillary, of course mcar Nov 2017 #30

Donna has paid her dues...nt LexVegas Nov 2017 #32

Doesn't matter if she paid her dues Fresh_Start Nov 2017 #36

She does have a point. Everything released in the hack was anti-HRC. moriah Nov 2017 #39

Anyone with a working brain could have figured out what would be asked at the debate Beaverhausen Nov 2017 #40

Exactly. I don't understand why Donna would feel the need to give those questions to anyone. LisaL Nov 2017 #43

Stay with that line of thinking and see where it leads. yardwork Nov 2017 #78

Right like it was shocking they'd get questions about lead in water in fucking Flint. tammywammy Nov 2017 #86

Sanders has ran on integrity for 3 decades. Integrity would be standing up when Clinton was attacked SandyZ Nov 2017 #41

You mean like standing up against the attacks on her "damn emails"? Jim Lane Nov 2017 #85

I think it is clear what "I mean". I do not play your games. SandyZ Nov 2017 #87

Don't forget that the media was just as responsible. LiberalFighter Nov 2017 #44

She was probably involved with Bush sending the debate tape to Gore. nt RandiFan1290 Nov 2017 #45

So now she's credible all of a sudden melman Nov 2017 #46

If you are looking for hypocrisy you are looking in the wrong direction. boston bean Nov 2017 #47

Like when Elizabeth Warren was a Hero for confirming that the primary was "rigged" ehrnst Nov 2017 #50

Lol! (points) You really said that! Squinch Nov 2017 #80

This message was self-deleted by its author chowder66 Nov 2017 #48

If they weren't aware before the debate, they were after. (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #54

It wasn't clear whether Hillary actually even saw the questions, anyway. LisaM Nov 2017 #58

It's pretty clear that she did NOT slip questions to Sanders and O'Malley. Jim Lane Nov 2017 #66

Her statement is ambiguous and Carlson didn't get the facts Jim Lane Nov 2017 #49

LOL @ the tortured JPR attempts to always malign Hillary. What Donna is saying is that Wikileaks R B Garr Nov 2017 #62

If you're against maligning Democrats, stop maligning Donna Brazile Jim Lane Nov 2017 #63

What a total sham, lol, I wasn't maligning Donna. Your analogies are tortured R B Garr Nov 2017 #67

As is so often the case, you respond to what I did not say. Jim Lane Nov 2017 #68

No, you're just copying me now from when I said your writings reference what R B Garr Nov 2017 #72

Things I didn't say Jim Lane Nov 2017 #75

You were "explaining nuances", and that's what you said. Based on what the R B Garr Nov 2017 #76

Yup. Tortured is a good way to put it. nt stevenleser Nov 2017 #65

Thanks. I deleted my post to minimize confusion. nt chowder66 Nov 2017 #69

lol at your pretzeled apologist post obamanut2012 Nov 2017 #70

thanks jim for being resonable questionseverything Nov 2017 #77

She has so much credibility...a mini Trump. Alice11111 Nov 2017 #51

and afterwards, Governor O'Malley said (as a reminder,) 2016 Is 'Not a Slam Dunk.' elleng Nov 2017 #57

Enough with this hiding the debates thing. I live on the West Coast. LisaM Nov 2017 #59

Sorry about that, elleng Nov 2017 #60

Most people are home Sunday nights. That's by far the best time. LisaM Nov 2017 #61

we must never again give the repubs a 3 month headstart debating questionseverything Nov 2017 #79

I completely agree, and I'll add that it goes beyond the free airtime Jim Lane Nov 2017 #83

agreed questionseverything Nov 2017 #88

Jesus Christ. joshcryer Nov 2017 #64

So Hillary DID rig the primaries Nevernose Nov 2017 #71

This must be why Tad Devine defended Brazile. n/t seaglass Nov 2017 #73

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #81