General Discussion

unblock

(56,177 posts)

53. yup. now i have the least squares.

Reply to enki23 (Reply #38)

Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:12 PM

Jul 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

141 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stochastic Terrorism [View all] nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 OP

Very smart. wakemewhenitsover Jul 2012 #1

knr Coexist Jul 2012 #2

Kick nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #3

interesting, but how is this a case of it? Enrique Jul 2012 #4

Remember what Rush said the other day nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #6

Do you habitually listen to Rush Limbaugh? slackmaster Jul 2012 #8

Just because the clip was played in every other media outlet nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #9

And if he didn't hear the clip? Brickbat Jul 2012 #12

I've never watched or listened to any of those sources slackmaster Jul 2012 #13

Go to media matters if you are so inclined. nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #14

Here is your quote nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #20

I'm not seeing a connection between such a trite conspiracy theory and some wack job shooting up... slackmaster Jul 2012 #21

What you call conspiracy theory nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #23

And there it is zappaman Jul 2012 #25

Must be the kind of science that has 60cm in a meter...nt SidDithers Jul 2012 #77

Ooooooooooooh...THAT science! zappaman Jul 2012 #95

This is DU, where we can say Ann Romney has sex with her horse, and nobody asks to see proof. limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #116

Defending Rush? zappaman Jul 2012 #118

There are assertions everywhere without facts. Why so much focus on one OP that accuses Rush ? limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #119

yes, that's all true about Rush zappaman Jul 2012 #120

... limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #121

Could you post some peer-reviewed articles on the concept of "stochastic terrorism"? Brickbat Jul 2012 #28

I searched for reputable publications on the subject of "stochastic terrorism" slackmaster Jul 2012 #60

Have you found anything online zappaman Jul 2012 #61

Only this thread slackmaster Jul 2012 #65

Try the International court nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #62

No, you're being told that you are ascribing a motive to the shooting zappaman Jul 2012 #64

I am familiar with the term "Incitement to Genocide" slackmaster Jul 2012 #66

See 67 nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #68

Already read it. It makes no sense. Terrorism by definition has an intended goal slackmaster Jul 2012 #71

In time it will nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #74

As near as I can tell, the term is a fairly recent one. Brickbat Jul 2012 #86

Use string "academic papers and stochastic terrorism" nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #90

All roads lead back to a January 2011 blog post on thedailykos.com slackmaster Jul 2012 #93

alas that is what you could not find nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #96

Are you speaking in some kind of code? zappaman Jul 2012 #97

Nadin is right about the origin in social sciences of the term stochastics. It's a branch of leveymg Jul 2012 #126

You got it right nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #130

Is it like being "in a few shootouts"? zappaman Jul 2012 #131

You don't have the abilities of the OP...obviously. zappaman Jul 2012 #24

don't make fun of nostradamus like that. dionysus Jul 2012 #57

You read DU don't you? That's where I read about Rush's clip. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #31

I don't have time to read everything, and I really don't care what media clownz say slackmaster Jul 2012 #59

The point isn't what YOU read or do not read. The point is that you accused the OP sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #82

I didn't accuse her of anything. I asked a question. slackmaster Jul 2012 #91

Nadin, I don't know how anyone who frequents DU could have missed truth2power Jul 2012 #73

I do nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #79

Do we blame this on bourbon obliviously Jul 2012 #104

Except you or anyone else has yet to hear a motive zappaman Jul 2012 #5

That's paranoid, just as ridiculous as blaming producers of violent movies like The Dark Night Rises slackmaster Jul 2012 #7

Actually it is a well understood phenomena nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #10

Did you learn a new term today and couldn't wait to share it? zappaman Jul 2012 #15

Reading your deliberate attempts to misunderstand, so do I n/t Mira Jul 2012 #26

Thank you! lapislzi Jul 2012 #69

Has been mentioned in several killings; one of police officers, another in SF at a 'liberal' place; freshwest Jul 2012 #113

Investigate. nc4bo Jul 2012 #11

Few names come to mind when you think of Hutzpa Jul 2012 #16

Thoughts. ananda Jul 2012 #17

The point is we need to have that conversation nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #18

The point is you have ascribed a motive before anyone else. zappaman Jul 2012 #19

Yes, and the more they're brought to light...ahem,right-wing radio...the less effective they'll be. gtar100 Jul 2012 #22

orange alert!!! kurtosis on the loose!! skewed deviance!! mean regression!! unblock Jul 2012 #27

He's just another victim of the GLM enki23 Jul 2012 #38

yup. now i have the least squares. unblock Jul 2012 #53

So let's suppose that it comes out that he is an OWS'er B2G Jul 2012 #29

Isn't that a hell of a jump from data available? nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #32

I was just following you over the cliff. n/t B2G Jul 2012 #35

So you are calling accepted science nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #37

Can you link to any news that supports your assertion? zappaman Jul 2012 #42

God you are condescending B2G Jul 2012 #43

No, I just pointed the phenomena nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #44

Bully. n/t zappaman Jul 2012 #45

The first sentence of your OP: B2G Jul 2012 #49

Yes, and nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #54

No. Actually you're the one who jumped DemocratsForProgress Jul 2012 #72

More entertainment nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #75

While you're enjoying your snack DemocratsForProgress Jul 2012 #78

Lovely nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #85

Hey, now. Some of us are hear to learn. TheManInTheMac Jul 2012 #87

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #132

Good jury decision! n/t zappaman Jul 2012 #133

And here I thought she was enjoying the banter B2G Jul 2012 #140

No, it's typical. zappaman Jul 2012 #141

"I know science is not the strong point of many"... SidDithers Jul 2012 #81

lol BOG PERSON Jul 2012 #114

I thought the media said he was a Teabagger? sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #36

And then backed off nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #39

I though Aurora was where Moore bought the gun B2G Jul 2012 #46

Ah expected nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #48

Yes, I know. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #50

Agreed zappaman Jul 2012 #52

Yup, care for some popcorn? nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #55

No, the nice thing about this theory is that it requires no hard evidence 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #83

K and fucking R zeemike Jul 2012 #30

Well, yes... nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #34

Probably not. zeemike Jul 2012 #40

Paranoid Schizophrenia cali Jul 2012 #33

If we're not supposed to leap to conclusions, why should we leap to the conclusion that he had HiPointDem Jul 2012 #41

I've maintained we shouldn't leap to political conclusions cali Jul 2012 #76

are you a psychiatrist or medical professional? HiPointDem Jul 2012 #88

No. As I said I worked within the Mental Health System for years cali Jul 2012 #110

iow not a medical professional or diagnostician. I myself worked "with" nuclear physicists. HiPointDem Jul 2012 #112

I can't stand Rush, either AnnieK401 Jul 2012 #47

Yes, this is how it works nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #51

I'm struggling to fathom how on Earth a Rush Limbaugh could benefit from a horrible crime like this slackmaster Jul 2012 #63

Here is what you are missing nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #67

The Fisher King - That's the basic premise of the story. Xipe Totec Jul 2012 #56

I know. nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #58

Oh, and I forgot to rec. lapislzi Jul 2012 #70

How do you differentiate "stoichiastic terrorism" from "sh*t happens" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #80

Why this theory entered the ICJ nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #84

This is an interesting theory kctim Jul 2012 #89

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! zappaman Jul 2012 #92

As I said in another thread, it's about degrees of separation of culpability. Zalatix Jul 2012 #94

so martin scorcese is a stochastic terrorist BOG PERSON Jul 2012 #98

Whoosh! nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #99

Yes, he is not alone. zappaman Jul 2012 #101

What a load of crap. Zax2me Jul 2012 #100

Nd when a crazy went nuts in an European country nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #102

Some people just think they know it all. zappaman Jul 2012 #103

you have quite a fan club fascisthunter Jul 2012 #105

And most are on ignore for good reason nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #106

good idea fascisthunter Jul 2012 #108

As in Scumbaugh malaise Jul 2012 #107

Yup...O'Reilly coud directly nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #109

Indeed malaise Jul 2012 #111

an unpleasant truth DonCoquixote Jul 2012 #115

Answer this question. Did Limbaugh talk about the movie months ago? SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #117

i thought the movie was just released, not understanding this one at all. loli phabay Jul 2012 #122

The OP is claiming that this is a case of stochastic terrorism. In other words, the act of SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #123

The OP has learned a new term and is edumacating us. zappaman Jul 2012 #124

The OP knows all... SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #125

You probably know less. See #126. leveymg Jul 2012 #127

The OP is wrong about the cause of this criminal act. You are confusing one thing with another. SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #128

You are confused about the nature of stochastics - studies indeterminacy, not cause and effect. leveymg Jul 2012 #134

You should have read the OP which stated that there was a direct link between Limbaugh's speech SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #135

Is your problem with nadin's OP above , G2Geek's DK post, or Paul Rosenberg at OpenLeft? leveymg Jul 2012 #136

Because the OP said there was a direct link between what Limbaugh said specifically SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #137

Reference to Limbaugh is once or twice removed. Take it up with the others at the link. leveymg Jul 2012 #138

Have you read *anything* in this thread? SlimJimmy Jul 2012 #139

precognition i suppose. loli phabay Jul 2012 #129