Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. I've read the only biographies available, one coolly neutral
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 09:42 PM
Nov 2017

but scarcely flattering and another very friendly, and that's about the upshot of his record after over 30 years in politics. His ideology shifted with the times, moderate with some positions considered "liberal" now in the 1970s, then moving to match Reagan and big business's agenda, becoming Chinese business's man in DC after Tienanmen Square, and as the new billionaire class grew supporting extreme economic libertarianism in return for their patronage. But always peddling his vote, and then his increasing power, for more power.

He loves that accumulation and exercise of power but apparently has never been interested in achieving a legacy of anything worthwhile to be known by. In fact, when he finally became majority leader, after 30 years of striving to reach that position, observers wondered if he would now finally start trying to achieve something of value for the history books, and no.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Soul? Those f*ckers don't have souls. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2017 #1
Agreed. They sold their soul long ago. It's now about saving their jobs. Va Lefty Nov 2017 #5
Exactly. applegrove Nov 2017 #7
Neither McConnell nor Moore, for sure. Hortensis Nov 2017 #11
+1000 Freethinker65 Nov 2017 #12
They are in a battle for something but certainly not their souls. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #17
True. They only respond to power and bullying. Tatiana Nov 2017 #20
Then God help the GOP... First Speaker Nov 2017 #2
In my view, McConnell has no personal morality. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #3
And shown MyOwnPeace Nov 2017 #8
McConnell needs to receive his bdamomma Nov 2017 #23
I've read the only biographies available, one coolly neutral Hortensis Nov 2017 #14
Agreed. The only value he has is serving to increase the value of the portfolio guillaumeb Nov 2017 #30
Experts in government corruption point out that Hortensis Nov 2017 #33
Yeah, as others have alluded to... renegade000 Nov 2017 #4
A sentence with McConnell, Moore & Soul in it delisen Nov 2017 #6
It sucks that the state party has such power exboyfil Nov 2017 #9
The GOP has no soul. They're just fighting over which carrion eaters get to tblue37 Nov 2017 #10
Soul? WHAT soul? elleng Nov 2017 #13
Like the battle for the great pumpkin in the cemetery on halloween. lindysalsagal Nov 2017 #15
To battle for a soul, they'd have to first have one still. Stand and Fight Nov 2017 #16
"the soul of the GOP" Hayduke Bomgarte Nov 2017 #18
And, here we are. Captain Stern Nov 2017 #19
If McConnell has a soul it must look likr a burnt raisin. CentralMass Nov 2017 #21
Whoa, the stakes couldn't be lower! gratuitous Nov 2017 #22
After Trump... D_Master81 Nov 2017 #24
"Sole," like the bottom of their feet? Or like the fish? Because "soul"? No. Nyet. Nein. Non. WinkyDink Nov 2017 #25
The devil now owns the soul you speak of Blue Owl Nov 2017 #26
Talk about a False Choice . . . . . no_hypocrisy Nov 2017 #27
I think opposition from establishement pukes like McConnell shanny Nov 2017 #28
Or is it asshole of the GOP? 3catwoman3 Nov 2017 #29
For there to be a battle, there must be a soul to fight over Gothmog Nov 2017 #31
+1000! Rhiannon12866 Nov 2017 #32
False premise. It's the same dark, twisted soul, just varnished vs unvarnished. JHB Nov 2017 #34
RedState.com blames McConnell for creating the Moore mess. Hortensis Nov 2017 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitch McConnell vs. Roy M...»Reply #14