Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 03:15 PM Nov 2017

Book: Steele says 70-90 percent of his Trump-Russia dossier is accurate [View all]

BY OLIVIA BEAVERS - 11/15/17

The former British intelligence officer behind the controversial Trump dossier believes his reports are "70 percent to 90 percent" accurate, according to a new book about Russia's influence in the 2016 election written by Guardian reporter Luke Harding.

Steele also reportedly believes the contents of his report will be verified and his work vindicated as special counsel Robert Mueller continues to investigate possible ties between the Trump campaign and Moscow, according to a Guardian story written about the book and published on Wednesday.

“I’ve been dealing with this country for thirty years. Why would I invent this stuff?” Steele is quoted as saying in Harding's new book, "Collusion: How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win."

According to Harding, Steele felt shocked by his findings and the information his sources gave him about the extent of the collusion, warning friends that reading his report would be a "life-changing experience.”

Harding's book also reportedly claims that Washington insiders took the explosive allegations in the dossier seriously because of Steele's trusted reputation of reporting on Kremlin matters, according to the Guardian. Steele reportedly wrote over a hundred reports on Russia and Ukraine between 2014 and 2016.

more
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/360508-book-steele-says-70-90-percent-of-his-trump-russia-dossier-is

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'd bet that one of the most shocking things to Steele was . . . gratuitous Nov 2017 #1
It's worse than that actually, la-de-dah wise GusBob Nov 2017 #2
Election wasn't over when Obama found out. lark Nov 2017 #4
That's not a very popular view around here GusBob Nov 2017 #5
Yeah, I thought twice before posting. lark Nov 2017 #7
According to the article, GusBob Nov 2017 #8
As a result, his legacy is being destroyed. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2017 #9
No, not at all ... just in hindsight it should've been an EXTREMELY loud and often alarm despite ... uponit7771 Nov 2017 #19
+1000 nt Fiendish Thingy Nov 2017 #10
sadly it did happen on his watch questionseverything Nov 2017 #12
I agree. He should have been strong on Russia. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #15
Obama deserves the BOD seeing the polls and it took Comey to tip them over to Red Don. You're ... uponit7771 Nov 2017 #18
Yes, the Pearl Harbour of the 21st Century. Obvious hints were missed. OnDoutside Nov 2017 #11
Simply NOT true... DonViejo Nov 2017 #16
According to the article, with respects to the Steele dossier GusBob Nov 2017 #20
Perhaps we are talking about 2 different things? GusBob Nov 2017 #21
They have been doing these things for years. Trumpf believes in the Putin way. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #14
Excellent read. Lots of info. Tightens up some details. Lots of background. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #3
European intelligence agencies started getting suspicious in 2015 due octoberlib Nov 2017 #6
I heard many describe it as raw intelligence. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #13
70% accuracy would mean its seriously flawed. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Book: Steele says 70-90 p...