Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm proposing an idea that should satisfy both gun nuts AND liberals/progressives... [View all]Warpy
(114,616 posts)9. Well, the powder goes in first, I'm afraid, then gets tamped down
with wadding, followed by the ball.
However, that doesn't serve people in rural areas well. Two shots are needed at the minimum: the first is to get the bears startled out of the garbage; the second is to drop the one bear in a million who charges.
Still, I'd love to see a drive by shootout between two cars full of punks using flint locks or even blunderbusses.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm proposing an idea that should satisfy both gun nuts AND liberals/progressives... [View all]
FarLeftFist
Jul 2012
OP
That would be a good start. A better one would be to interpret the 2nd amend
apocalypsehow
Jul 2012
#5
my husband who is a gun owner is a firm believer in laws that restrict.... i am not sure
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#21
my solution isn't nearly as effective, true; but it has a far better shot at becoming reality.
unblock
Jul 2012
#27
I'm against such an absurd proposal, of course, but it would have one upside:
Johnny Rico
Jul 2012
#30
the Girandoni Air Rifle existed about 10 years before the 2nd Amendment was written.
belcffub
Jul 2012
#41