Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd bet that one of the most shocking things to Steele was . . . gratuitous Nov 2017 #1
It's worse than that actually, la-de-dah wise GusBob Nov 2017 #2
Election wasn't over when Obama found out. lark Nov 2017 #4
That's not a very popular view around here GusBob Nov 2017 #5
Yeah, I thought twice before posting. lark Nov 2017 #7
According to the article, GusBob Nov 2017 #8
As a result, his legacy is being destroyed. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2017 #9
No, not at all ... just in hindsight it should've been an EXTREMELY loud and often alarm despite ... uponit7771 Nov 2017 #19
+1000 nt Fiendish Thingy Nov 2017 #10
sadly it did happen on his watch questionseverything Nov 2017 #12
I agree. He should have been strong on Russia. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #15
Obama deserves the BOD seeing the polls and it took Comey to tip them over to Red Don. You're ... uponit7771 Nov 2017 #18
Yes, the Pearl Harbour of the 21st Century. Obvious hints were missed. OnDoutside Nov 2017 #11
Simply NOT true... DonViejo Nov 2017 #16
According to the article, with respects to the Steele dossier GusBob Nov 2017 #20
Perhaps we are talking about 2 different things? GusBob Nov 2017 #21
They have been doing these things for years. Trumpf believes in the Putin way. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #14
Excellent read. Lots of info. Tightens up some details. Lots of background. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #3
European intelligence agencies started getting suspicious in 2015 due octoberlib Nov 2017 #6
I heard many describe it as raw intelligence. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #13
70% accuracy would mean its seriously flawed. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Book: Steele says 70-90 p...»Reply #12