Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
17. 70% accuracy would mean its seriously flawed.
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 07:17 PM
Nov 2017

If that’s the case it’s great that Mueller has/is looking at it but also makes it unfit for public consumption without much further investigation. That and people from all walks of life often embellish a bit when talking about their own work. As much material as it covers that would provide a wide range of arguments to simply dismiss the whole thing.

With Mueller it’s a different story and might lead to a lot more. Through the investigation finding the truth also means you uncover the inaccuracies. If an original sources of an inaccuracy can be found there might be more there. Why did they provide the information? Who did they hear it from?

I’m sure Mueller is well down that path. I can’t imagine how intense and exciting his job must be.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd bet that one of the most shocking things to Steele was . . . gratuitous Nov 2017 #1
It's worse than that actually, la-de-dah wise GusBob Nov 2017 #2
Election wasn't over when Obama found out. lark Nov 2017 #4
That's not a very popular view around here GusBob Nov 2017 #5
Yeah, I thought twice before posting. lark Nov 2017 #7
According to the article, GusBob Nov 2017 #8
As a result, his legacy is being destroyed. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2017 #9
No, not at all ... just in hindsight it should've been an EXTREMELY loud and often alarm despite ... uponit7771 Nov 2017 #19
+1000 nt Fiendish Thingy Nov 2017 #10
sadly it did happen on his watch questionseverything Nov 2017 #12
I agree. He should have been strong on Russia. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #15
Obama deserves the BOD seeing the polls and it took Comey to tip them over to Red Don. You're ... uponit7771 Nov 2017 #18
Yes, the Pearl Harbour of the 21st Century. Obvious hints were missed. OnDoutside Nov 2017 #11
Simply NOT true... DonViejo Nov 2017 #16
According to the article, with respects to the Steele dossier GusBob Nov 2017 #20
Perhaps we are talking about 2 different things? GusBob Nov 2017 #21
They have been doing these things for years. Trumpf believes in the Putin way. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #14
Excellent read. Lots of info. Tightens up some details. Lots of background. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #3
European intelligence agencies started getting suspicious in 2015 due octoberlib Nov 2017 #6
I heard many describe it as raw intelligence. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #13
70% accuracy would mean its seriously flawed. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Book: Steele says 70-90 p...»Reply #17