Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
9. I think it is dangerous to eliminate all superdelegates for that reason
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 08:40 PM
Nov 2017

However, each state should have a number proportional to the number of registered Democrats in that state, and the superdelegates must be chosen from elected state and federal officeholders, rather than people in various party positions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If The Cons Had Supers Me. Nov 2017 #1
I remember them being jealous of the Dems superdelegates. OnDoutside Nov 2017 #4
I think it is dangerous to eliminate all superdelegates for that reason FarCenter Nov 2017 #9
I'll accept the need to eliminate superdelegates meow2u3 Nov 2017 #2
Good point. OnDoutside Nov 2017 #5
The Democratic Party doesn't control that. Jim Lane Nov 2017 #6
Yes, excellent! leftofcool Nov 2017 #12
Bona fide Dems. oasis Nov 2017 #16
They need to have won at least one election as a Democrat jmowreader Nov 2017 #21
Fair enough in my opinion. n/t whopis01 Nov 2017 #25
I'd be OK with them gone greeny2323 Nov 2017 #3
If they can come up with system that can keep a Red Don running for head of dem party then yeah uponit7771 Nov 2017 #7
The point to getting rid of SDs is to validate an absurd narrative about 2016 and pretend that they StevieM Nov 2017 #8
An interesting alternative would be the make the SDs winner-take-all delegates, by state. (eom) StevieM Nov 2017 #10
I think super delegates are a bit like the Electoral College. Popular vote doesn't count 100%. jalan48 Nov 2017 #11
Exactly. Not truly Democratic. n/t whopis01 Nov 2017 #26
Thank you, Senator Kaine. The existence of superdelegates is undemocratic. demmiblue Nov 2017 #13
Wonderful. Sienna86 Nov 2017 #14
That alone would go a long way to reform the process. Super delegates were a necessary evil in ... marble falls Nov 2017 #15
Superdelegates did not exist in the 60s former9thward Nov 2017 #19
From wikipedia marble falls Nov 2017 #20
Thanks. Exactly what I said. former9thward Nov 2017 #24
I don't have a specific issue with superdelegates as a concept. Gore1FL Nov 2017 #17
Eliminate superdelegates, eliminate caucuses, eliminate the extremely early registration dates PatsFan87 Nov 2017 #18
I Am In Favor of Eliminating Superdelegates if We Get Rid of Caucuses... TomCADem Nov 2017 #22
Get rid of them Raine Nov 2017 #23
I would like a rule by which the delegates get one chance, no decision, default to popular vote Not Ruth Nov 2017 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tim Kaine calls for elimi...»Reply #9