Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,260 posts)
23. Not true. The same district lines that pack African Americans into certain districts
Thu Nov 16, 2017, 03:16 AM
Nov 2017

affect their representation in Congress and in the national convention.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2016 articles elleng Nov 2017 #1
I said that. And their position hasn't changed one iota. n/t pnwmom Nov 2017 #2
It would be better to get rid of the undemocratic caucus system 4now Nov 2017 #3
Yes it would. comradebillyboy Nov 2017 #5
I agree. n/t pnwmom Nov 2017 #12
"although it has never changed the outcome of a primary" loyalsister Nov 2017 #4
It is silly to think that Barbara Lee, for instance, influences her voters pnwmom Nov 2017 #10
Seriously? loyalsister Nov 2017 #27
Yes. She has loyal constituents by virtue of her being a good representative -- pnwmom Nov 2017 #28
It's not because she's a super delegate loyalsister Nov 2017 #29
No, you've got it backwards. She's a superdelegate so she can have more influence pnwmom Nov 2017 #30
I support this candidate and you should too loyalsister Nov 2017 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author David__77 Nov 2017 #6
I wish the GOP had a superdelegate system EffieBlack Nov 2017 #7
I agree with CBC Gothmog Nov 2017 #8
This is the stupidest argument I've ever heard Azathoth Nov 2017 #9
Black people are gerrymandered out of fair representation in the House pnwmom Nov 2017 #11
GOP gerrymandering only applies to general elections Azathoth Nov 2017 #13
And getting minority Democrats in the House requires them winning in the General. moriah Nov 2017 #19
Her point doesn't remain because it has absolutely nothing to do with convention delegates Azathoth Nov 2017 #20
If the issue is that Dems in the House and Senate... moriah Nov 2017 #22
I think you're misunderstanding what she's saying Azathoth Nov 2017 #25
Not true. The same district lines that pack African Americans into certain districts pnwmom Nov 2017 #23
we choose our delegates based on those districts dsc Nov 2017 #37
So if I'm reading the CBC statement correctly, the only reason they want to keep the superdelegate PatsFan87 Nov 2017 #14
An even better question is why should they have a right to shape the convention at all? Azathoth Nov 2017 #15
Because otherwise African Americans would be grossly underrepresented in the convention pnwmom Nov 2017 #17
You have posted this more than once, and you still haven't justified it Azathoth Nov 2017 #18
You don't understand. Districts are gerrymandered along racial lines to reduce pnwmom Nov 2017 #21
I don't entirely agree Azathoth Nov 2017 #24
Because African Americans are so heavily Democratic, gerrymandering along party lines pnwmom Nov 2017 #26
only democrats vote in primaries. to do otherwise is to commit suicide nt msongs Nov 2017 #16
IMO the super delegate system is inherentily undemocratic. CentralMass Nov 2017 #32
+1000 Kentonio Nov 2017 #33
Okay JustAnotherGen Nov 2017 #35
I rbink caucuses should be replaced with primaries and the superdekegates should be scrapped.. . CentralMass Nov 2017 #36
Agree. Caucuses have no place in our party octoberlib Nov 2017 #40
I stand with the CBC mcar Nov 2017 #34
2 things 1 in my state any way... congressperson is automatic super delegate. They don't have to dembotoz Nov 2017 #38
So do I. SO DO I!! NurseJackie Nov 2017 #39
Break down by the former DNC chair... disillusioned73 Nov 2017 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Congressional Black C...»Reply #23