Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Congressional Black Caucus strongly opposes calls to abolish superdelegates. [View all]dembotoz
(16,922 posts)38. 2 things 1 in my state any way... congressperson is automatic super delegate. They don't have to
Compete..they are in. Going to a national convention is good for a congressperson career. Their ticket is punched.
Is this good or bad? Above my pay scale. But it does point out that they have a vested interest.
2. In my state, the primary went one way, the super dels virtually all went the other way...I can understand one of the Congress persons vote as a super.. her district was the only one where the primary loser won. She represented her district. If perhaps the super were required to vote at least one the first ballot for the person who won the primary, I would be happier.
A vote should mean something
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Congressional Black Caucus strongly opposes calls to abolish superdelegates. [View all]
pnwmom
Nov 2017
OP
No, you've got it backwards. She's a superdelegate so she can have more influence
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#30
And getting minority Democrats in the House requires them winning in the General.
moriah
Nov 2017
#19
Her point doesn't remain because it has absolutely nothing to do with convention delegates
Azathoth
Nov 2017
#20
Not true. The same district lines that pack African Americans into certain districts
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#23
So if I'm reading the CBC statement correctly, the only reason they want to keep the superdelegate
PatsFan87
Nov 2017
#14
An even better question is why should they have a right to shape the convention at all?
Azathoth
Nov 2017
#15
Because otherwise African Americans would be grossly underrepresented in the convention
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#17
Because African Americans are so heavily Democratic, gerrymandering along party lines
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#26
I rbink caucuses should be replaced with primaries and the superdekegates should be scrapped.. .
CentralMass
Nov 2017
#36