NEW/Updated: Statement From Al Franken:

[Ms. Toad]

97. I'm accurately labeling what you have done in this thread

by posting a half-naked, sexually suggestive, photo of Franken's accuser and by repeatedly insisting that the photo is relevant to her credibility.

I am using that term, because subtle (and some not-so-subtle) attempts to get you to understand what you are doing are not making a dent. You seem to need to be figuratively hit over the head with a 2x4 in order to understand that equating a half-naked, sexually suggestive photo of Franken's accuser with her credibility implies you believe she is a lying slut. Especially when you subsequently post - by way of comparison - a prim and proper photo of Moore's accuser.

The link you are repeatedly trying to make is precisely the reason there are rape shield laws - to prevent rapists from painting their accusers as lying sluts. Appearance and past sexual behavior have NOTHING to do with credibility of a witnesses' account of what happened on a specific date with a specific person. You have repeatedly insisted that it does.