Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cliff's Notes for DU today: "I believe her... unless he is a liberal Democrat" [View all]Bucky
(55,334 posts)21. Good questions
So what would satisfy your need for accountability?
An afternoon in the stocks? -- No
Five hundred cuts instead of a thousand? Bring me ketchup, your words are starting to taste funny.
Force him to listen to 10 hours of Kellyanne Conway tapes? - Prohibited by the 8th Amendment
An indignant lecture from Orrin Hatch about his lower middle class upbringing (while wearing a tailored suit that could have paid three months' rent for some of his less well-off constituents)? Now you're just being silly
An afternoon in the stocks? -- No
Five hundred cuts instead of a thousand? Bring me ketchup, your words are starting to taste funny.
Force him to listen to 10 hours of Kellyanne Conway tapes? - Prohibited by the 8th Amendment
An indignant lecture from Orrin Hatch about his lower middle class upbringing (while wearing a tailored suit that could have paid three months' rent for some of his less well-off constituents)? Now you're just being silly
I'm not the one responsible for that decision. If ... If he's found to have done these things, there are procedures. She might could sue him for harassment. The Senate might have a rebuke or censure option to exercise. The accusations obviously fall far short of expulsion. Clearly there's gonna be some further apologizing he'll do (again if the ethics inquiry bears out this all to be true.
I'm a real "let the punishment fit the crime" kind of guy. Let the process determine the crime first. In the mean time, let DUers quit betraying their feminist values and quit assuming she's lying because she accused someone we like.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cliff's Notes for DU today: "I believe her... unless he is a liberal Democrat" [View all]
Bucky
Nov 2017
OP
I don't recall much call for questioning Moore's or Trump's or Weinstein's accusers
Bucky
Nov 2017
#5
I'm not talking about Democratic Senators. Note the headline -- I'm talking about DUers
Bucky
Nov 2017
#45
Don't put words in my mouth. I have no complaints about Franken. He's handling this properly.
Bucky
Nov 2017
#4
I would think she may be embellishing because of her connections with fox news
Kirk Lover
Nov 2017
#49
That the photo was staged is, in fact, a defense. It puts the lie to that part of the story.
alarimer
Nov 2017
#30
You'll excuse me if I hold myself to a higher moral standard than Trump supporters
Bucky
Nov 2017
#12
I don't know about her politics. I know the first accusation that she was a Trumper was Snopes'd
Bucky
Nov 2017
#27
I was not accusing you of false equivalency although I can see how you could take it that way.
rzemanfl
Nov 2017
#36