General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Leeann Tweeden's questionable claims. [View all]moriah
(8,311 posts)What I DID see, not when I clicked the button on this relatively mild post, but on others...
Unless "slut-shaming" falls under the "no bigotry/insensitivity" rule, I didn't know which rule to choose about why saying because she tackle-hugged Robin Williams obviously she wanted to be Frenched or have a photo taken while she was asleep is inappropriate on DU.
Hell, it took a *long* time for the thread that outright said her choices to let men ogle her body on her own terms meant it was impossible for her to now claim to be an "innocent victim". Fuck that noise, the only "guilty victim" is one making a false allegation, raping a prostitute isn't theft of property, taking a sexualized picture of a model while she's asleep isn't "fine" just because she has modeled in sexual positions while awake.
Of course, if I'd been her, I'd have sent the USO and Franken a copyright claim on the photo 10 years ago, saying her agreement to let the USO use her image only included images while she was awake. But if she felt the USO would end up eating the bills instead of Franken, she might have considered and tossed the option.