Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Legal: AR-15's. Illegal: Marijuana [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)48. Ironicaly, medical pot users (with prescriptions) are nearly the only ones that can't have guns now
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unfortunately, DEA doesn't respect the voting we did in CA and other places
kestrel91316
Jul 2012
#11
I agree, and as an example - the exact same rifle. It's all a matter of perception.
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#13
If you happen to have one of a small number of AR-15's sold before 1986, you could
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2012
#24
We don't need to. Look at the dearth of Fully Automatic weapons recovered from crime scenes.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2012
#55
Not really. There is quite the difference between an M-16 and an AR-15. Just to clarify, the rifle
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#61
Excuse me but your thinking leaves much to reflect on. I also carried an M-16 in Viet Nam
upaloopa
Jul 2012
#45
I'd hate to see an M16 becoming legal to own, too...don't see anything wrong with the AR-15 for
LiberalLoner
Jul 2012
#47
People don't buy AR-15s for hunting. You walk into a gun store in any red city like Bakersfield
upaloopa
Jul 2012
#50
Now watch them screen this guy for drugs and find traces of pot in a hair sample.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2012
#22
Perhaps if the shooter had some pot to smoke, he would have procranstinated about his revenge
Lionessa
Jul 2012
#10
He said vote, not "register to vote". There is a lot of difference, esp in some states.
rhett o rick
Jul 2012
#16
I agree, it is more of a canyon than a hole, it makes the law non-existent with a work around
Dragonfli
Jul 2012
#42
You know as well as I that it is the opposite, people bring guns into my state all the time
Dragonfli
Jul 2012
#49
But just because he says they are facts doesnt make it so. He spoke of voter REGISTRATION not
rhett o rick
Jul 2012
#65
Exactly. Also peculiar: A forum on DU to fawn over and fetishize guns. But a sex forum!?
villager
Jul 2012
#28
heck no! If we had forums like that, the site wouldn't be taken seriously! But a forum for...
villager
Jul 2012
#57
From what I hear, the gun laws in Canada are nearly identical to the laws here, yet
tclambert
Jul 2012
#44
Well, they will only change gun laws to allow even more lethal weapons, but there is something
Dragonfli
Jul 2012
#39