Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Biden tells NPR he "fought like hell" to support Anita Hill and oppose Clarence Thomas' [View all]ucrdem
(15,720 posts)99. Biden says she backed out, and he was running the hearings.
The 1994 WaPo article you linked to above says Wright was angling for a columnist's job, and she says she was "betrayed" by someone on her paper who published her Thomas column without her permission, thus triggering the invitation from Washington:
Wright says she never intended to have the column published; she intended it as a sample only. She showed it to some co-workers. She planned to polish it, and eventually submit it to editors, but she never got the chance. The next day, she was at work when a clerk yelled across the newsroom that she had a phone call.
It was the Senate Judiciary Committee. Its members wondered if she would be willing to talk to them about Clarence Thomas. They had heard that she'd written a column on the subject.
Someone at the paper, she realized, had betrayed her.
Something had begun that might be unstoppable.
It was the Senate Judiciary Committee. Its members wondered if she would be willing to talk to them about Clarence Thomas. They had heard that she'd written a column on the subject.
Someone at the paper, she realized, had betrayed her.
Something had begun that might be unstoppable.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1994/10/09/the-other-woman/ca495db5-5a09-4397-8620-fd443751c8e2/?utm_term=.76ccc00d67c1
Wright had a lot to lose, says she was unwillingly brought into the process, says she never meant to publish the column, says a lot of things. Biden claims she declined to testify at the last minute. That was perfectly within her rights, and she probably would have paid a high price if she had. So I'm sorry but I'm inclined to believe Biden. He also named a staffer, Ron Klein, who was managing the hearing and also knew of Wright's change of mind.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Biden tells NPR he "fought like hell" to support Anita Hill and oppose Clarence Thomas' [View all]
ucrdem
Nov 2017
OP
There were other witnesses ready to testify. And he let the GOP walk all over him.
bettyellen
Nov 2017
#1
So is he blaming Anita Hill for the other witness's decision not to give evidence?
spooky3
Nov 2017
#55
I watched the entire confirmation hearings. He did a terrible job as CHAIR. And if the witnesses
spooky3
Nov 2017
#61
I'm watching the special public televised hearing he called to address this matter now.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#67
If you did not see the original hearing, I suggest you may want to suspend your questioning of those
spooky3
Nov 2017
#70
No, I shouldn't. His treatment of her was bad during the hearing, and until he owns it
spooky3
Nov 2017
#68
Yes, "failure to come clean" is a very good reason to not support a candidate...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2017
#102
And he was the CHAIR of the committee. He could have interjected when members behaved
spooky3
Nov 2017
#56
Well, I recall listening to the hearings waiting for Wright to be called, but she never was...
JHB
Nov 2017
#16
It's always possible, but that wasn't her position when interviewed shortly thereafter...
JHB
Nov 2017
#23
For the most part I agree, since I think the error was not opposing Thomas earlier...
JHB
Nov 2017
#27
The conventional DU wisdom is that Biden sliced Hill to shreds in an effort to support Thomas.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#15
You asked for something that is difficult to provide. I complied. You're welcome. nt
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#48
As I provided recollections of what I remeber from the time, which are not available online.
JHB
Nov 2017
#50
The conventional wisdom is that he gave lukewarm support to Anita Hill, not that he shredded her.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#30
Right, Biden supported Hill and opposed the Thomas nomination. Publicly, on live TV.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#39
Angela Wright was subpoenaed and she was waiting to be called. She sat there waiting for 3 days
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#52
Last night Biden said she changed her mind and named a corroroborating witness, Ron Klein.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#53
Well SHE never said she changed her mind. And I believe HER, and the other two witnesses
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#62
Oh, I see. Biden's lukewarm support was enough because Hill could never succeed anyway.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#43
Were you an adult when this was going on? Do you remember the circus-like atmosphere?
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#60
Sorry Joe, you were so busy pontificating, that you threw Anita Hill to the republican wolves
still_one
Nov 2017
#69
There is no evidence for that except Biden's say-so, and Angela Wright disagrees.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#75
She said in 2007 that she was "fully prepared to testify" and "committed to going through with the
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#83
It still doesn't negate the obnoxious grand standing he did, and failure to protect Anita Hill from
still_one
Nov 2017
#85
He allowed Thomas to rebut her and slur her character and frame her testimony before she had
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#88