Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Biden tells NPR he "fought like hell" to support Anita Hill and oppose Clarence Thomas' [View all]ucrdem
(15,720 posts)100. The transcript of the 4th day, when Hill testified, runs to 1,032 single-spaced pages.
You can download the PDF here:
http://www.loc.gov/law/find/nominations/thomas/hearing-pt4.pdf
It includes complete transcripts of Wright's and Jourdain's testimony to committee staffers, and on pages 439, Biden's invitation to Wright to testify personally, which she signed on page 440:
Dear Ms. Wright: It is my preference that you testify before the
Judiciary Committee in connection with the nomination of Judge
Clarence Thomas.
But, in light of the time constraints under which
the Committee is operating and the willingness of all the members
of the Committee to have placed in the record of the hearing the
transcripts of the interviews of you and your corroborating witness,
Ms. Rose Jourdain, J-o-u-r-d-a-i-n, conducted by the majority and
minority staff, I am prepared to accede to the mutual agreement of
you and the members of the Committee, both Republican and Democrat,
that the subpoena be vitiated. Thus the transcribed interviews
of you and Ms. Rose Jourdain will be placed in the record
without rebuttal at the hearing.
I wish to make clear, however, that if you want to testify at the
hearing in person I will honor that request.
Signed: Sincerely, Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Postscript on the bottom I attached from Angela Wright: "I
agree the admission of the transcript of my interview and that of
Ms. Jourdain's in the record without rebuttal at the hearing represents
my position and is completely satisfactory to me."
Judiciary Committee in connection with the nomination of Judge
Clarence Thomas.
But, in light of the time constraints under which
the Committee is operating and the willingness of all the members
of the Committee to have placed in the record of the hearing the
transcripts of the interviews of you and your corroborating witness,
Ms. Rose Jourdain, J-o-u-r-d-a-i-n, conducted by the majority and
minority staff, I am prepared to accede to the mutual agreement of
you and the members of the Committee, both Republican and Democrat,
that the subpoena be vitiated. Thus the transcribed interviews
of you and Ms. Rose Jourdain will be placed in the record
without rebuttal at the hearing.
I wish to make clear, however, that if you want to testify at the
hearing in person I will honor that request.
Signed: Sincerely, Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Postscript on the bottom I attached from Angela Wright: "I
agree the admission of the transcript of my interview and that of
Ms. Jourdain's in the record without rebuttal at the hearing represents
my position and is completely satisfactory to me."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Biden tells NPR he "fought like hell" to support Anita Hill and oppose Clarence Thomas' [View all]
ucrdem
Nov 2017
OP
There were other witnesses ready to testify. And he let the GOP walk all over him.
bettyellen
Nov 2017
#1
So is he blaming Anita Hill for the other witness's decision not to give evidence?
spooky3
Nov 2017
#55
I watched the entire confirmation hearings. He did a terrible job as CHAIR. And if the witnesses
spooky3
Nov 2017
#61
I'm watching the special public televised hearing he called to address this matter now.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#67
If you did not see the original hearing, I suggest you may want to suspend your questioning of those
spooky3
Nov 2017
#70
No, I shouldn't. His treatment of her was bad during the hearing, and until he owns it
spooky3
Nov 2017
#68
Yes, "failure to come clean" is a very good reason to not support a candidate...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2017
#102
And he was the CHAIR of the committee. He could have interjected when members behaved
spooky3
Nov 2017
#56
Well, I recall listening to the hearings waiting for Wright to be called, but she never was...
JHB
Nov 2017
#16
It's always possible, but that wasn't her position when interviewed shortly thereafter...
JHB
Nov 2017
#23
For the most part I agree, since I think the error was not opposing Thomas earlier...
JHB
Nov 2017
#27
The conventional DU wisdom is that Biden sliced Hill to shreds in an effort to support Thomas.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#15
You asked for something that is difficult to provide. I complied. You're welcome. nt
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#48
As I provided recollections of what I remeber from the time, which are not available online.
JHB
Nov 2017
#50
The conventional wisdom is that he gave lukewarm support to Anita Hill, not that he shredded her.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#30
Right, Biden supported Hill and opposed the Thomas nomination. Publicly, on live TV.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#39
Angela Wright was subpoenaed and she was waiting to be called. She sat there waiting for 3 days
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#52
Last night Biden said she changed her mind and named a corroroborating witness, Ron Klein.
ucrdem
Nov 2017
#53
Well SHE never said she changed her mind. And I believe HER, and the other two witnesses
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#62
Oh, I see. Biden's lukewarm support was enough because Hill could never succeed anyway.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#43
Were you an adult when this was going on? Do you remember the circus-like atmosphere?
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#60
Sorry Joe, you were so busy pontificating, that you threw Anita Hill to the republican wolves
still_one
Nov 2017
#69
There is no evidence for that except Biden's say-so, and Angela Wright disagrees.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#75
She said in 2007 that she was "fully prepared to testify" and "committed to going through with the
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#83
It still doesn't negate the obnoxious grand standing he did, and failure to protect Anita Hill from
still_one
Nov 2017
#85
He allowed Thomas to rebut her and slur her character and frame her testimony before she had
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#88