Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Denzil_DC

(9,202 posts)
33. Oh yeah.
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 11:00 AM
Nov 2017

Last edited Mon Nov 20, 2017, 11:36 AM - Edit history (1)

You might have gathered from my tone above that I was partly joshing (think Yes, Minister).

In theory, everything I say is true. In practice, the Queen's role is more ceremonial and as constitutional window dressing. It would be unthinkable, for instance, for her to withhold royal assent at the last stage of passing a law, though it's one of her theoretical powers (it's not been done since the time of Queen Anne, in 1707).

As I said earlier, I have a feeling the next generation of royals are going to want to scale back their duties and lifestyle (possibly more along the lines of nordic royalty). But it is very hard to see how we could engineer a vote to remove the monarchy (and again, please don't suggest a referendum ...).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wish them all the best. VermontKevin Nov 2017 #1
They/anti-democratic parasites UTUSN Nov 2017 #2
oh my steve2470 Nov 2017 #3
I didn't join the Royalist Underground, but am breaking my own rule of skipping UTUSN Nov 2017 #6
Is someone forcing the British electorate to maintain a monarchy? brooklynite Nov 2017 #10
did you mean to reply to me ? steve2470 Nov 2017 #12
We've never had a vote on it. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #14
...and that's because your elected representatives (Lib, Lab and Cons) have chosen not to have one brooklynite Nov 2017 #15
Why? And why's it matter to you anyway? You like them so much, you can have them!. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #17
This is a political blog; we talk about politics here. brooklynite Nov 2017 #19
Really? Dang. I hadn't noticed. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #22
I could care less whether there's a monarchy or not... brooklynite Nov 2017 #25
Let me entertain this for just a moment, since you're so serious and political and all. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #26
I didn't realize the monarchy was so embedded in the UK system, but it makes perfect sense steve2470 Nov 2017 #27
Oh yeah. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #33
Luckily, you don t have a Constitution... brooklynite Nov 2017 #34
Yes, we do have a constitution. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #37
Excellent post malaise Nov 2017 #38
Other monarchies have cooler monarchs Retrograde Nov 2017 #16
Lol. cwydro Nov 2017 #31
She has served her country for many many years. cwydro Nov 2017 #32
70 years is quite an accomplishment. tammywammy Nov 2017 #4
God bless Her Majesty and Prince Philip Glorfindel Nov 2017 #5
President Obama was the 12th US president during her reign... Princess Turandot Nov 2017 #7
The Queen is looking well. roamer65 Nov 2017 #8
I don't if it's me, but Phillip looks a little "off" LeftInTX Nov 2017 #9
Nah, that's just how he looks. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #13
Weren't they planning for his passing just just a couple months ago? Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2017 #23
He's officially retired from public appearances, only the odd exceptional one nowadays. Denzil_DC Nov 2017 #24
Love! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ NurseJackie Nov 2017 #11
And she drinks four cocktails a day. kskiska Nov 2017 #18
She can because she doesn't have to worry about driving FakeNoose Nov 2017 #20
that's a great gif lol nt steve2470 Nov 2017 #21
I wonder how her liver is holding out. Four alcoholic drinks a day? CTyankee Nov 2017 #35
70 years..wow MFM008 Nov 2017 #28
I Guess We Know RobinA Nov 2017 #30
That is a lovely photograph of them. smirkymonkey Nov 2017 #36
She has been a formidable person for a lifetime and OnDoutside Nov 2017 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New photographs celebrate...»Reply #33