Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(64,387 posts)

10. Those who voted couldn't consider safety? Why not?

Mon Nov 20, 2017, 03:24 PM

Nov 2017

And who would stop them from considering safety and the integrity of their drinking water?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nebraska, goddam gratuitous Nov 2017 #1

Six railcars. WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2017 #2

Guess they don't like drinking water. Vinca Nov 2017 #3

210000 gallons is a cube 30.4 feet on a side. FarCenter Nov 2017 #4

Well alright then - no problem! hatrack Nov 2017 #5

OK then, a cube 43.1 feet on a side. FarCenter Nov 2017 #8

This is a big story. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #7

K&R 2naSalit Nov 2017 #9

Those who voted couldn't consider safety? Why not? Ilsa Nov 2017 #10

I guess they figure it will be safe-it's been pre-disastered! Dread Pirate Roberts Nov 2017 #12