Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sirveri

(4,517 posts)
12. A non semi-auto assault weapon would be the Sharps Carbine.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 08:34 PM
Jul 2012

However considering that's a heirloom of the Civil War, I'm not sure if most people would consider it to be an 'assault weapon'. Considering it was used by cavalry to 'assault' enemy positions however, I guess it qualifies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You of course are correct SoutherDem Jul 2012 #1
If guns were banned in Colorado, I am sure he would have found another way Taverner Jul 2012 #2
I second that Populist_Prole Jul 2012 #3
The shotgun he had was non semi-automatic. RedStateLiberal Jul 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author abolugi Jul 2012 #5
Good post. nt woo me with science Jul 2012 #6
Semi-auto is typically a setting available on machine guns 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #7
That's simply incorrect cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #9
I was making a joke 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #10
I apologize! cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #11
In Google News, I can find 2 "semi-automatic rifles", 1 "semi-automatic weapon" muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #8
A non semi-auto assault weapon would be the Sharps Carbine. Sirveri Jul 2012 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oy! Will this "semi-...»Reply #12