Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
25. So, imagine you're in a relationship with someone.
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 02:55 AM
Nov 2017

The two of you mutually decide to take intimate photos or video. You break up with the other person. They get mad so they distribute the photos or videos online. Do you think that's okay to do, release the photos?

This is what revenge porn laws are working against. The majority of victims are women.

Texas Penal Code Section 21.16

Sec. 21.16. UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OR PROMOTION OF INTIMATE VISUAL MATERIAL.
(a) In this section:
(1) “Intimate parts” means the naked genitals, pubic area, anus, buttocks, or female nipple of a person.
(2) “Promote” means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, or advertise or to offer or agree to do any of the above.
(3) “Sexual conduct” means sexual contact, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse.
(4) “Simulated” means the explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.
(5) “Visual material” means:
(A) any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide or any photographic reproduction that contains or incorporates in any manner any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide; or
(B) any disk, diskette, or other physical medium that allows an image to be displayed on a computer or other video screen and any image transmitted to a computer or other video screen by telephone line, cable, satellite transmission, or other method.
(b) A person commits an offense if:
(1) without the effective consent of the depicted person, the person intentionally discloses visual material depicting another person with the person’s intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct;
(2) the visual material was obtained by the person or created under circumstances in which the depicted person had a reasonable expectation that the visual material would remain private;
(3) the disclosure of the visual material causes harm to the depicted person; and
(4) the disclosure of the visual material reveals the identity of the depicted person in any manner, including through:
(A) any accompanying or subsequent information or material related to the visual material; or
(B) information or material provided by a third party in response to the disclosure of the visual material.
(c) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally threatens to disclose, without the consent of the depicted person, visual material depicting another person with the person’s intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct and the actor makes the threat to obtain a benefit:
(1) in return for not making the disclosure; or
(2) in connection with the threatened disclosure.
(d) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content of the visual material, the person promotes visual material described by Subsection (b) on an Internet website or other forum for publication that is owned or operated by the person.
(e) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted person:
(1) created or consented to the creation of the visual material; or
(2) voluntarily transmitted the visual material to the actor.
(f) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (b) or (d) that:
(1) the disclosure or promotion is made in the course of:
(A) lawful and common practices of law enforcement or medical treatment;
(B) reporting unlawful activity; or
(C) a legal proceeding, if the disclosure or promotion is permitted or required by law;
(2) the disclosure or promotion consists of visual material depicting in a public or commercial setting only a person’s voluntary exposure of:
(A) the person’s intimate parts; or
(B) the person engaging in sexual conduct; or
(3) the actor is an interactive computer service, as defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 230, and the disclosure or promotion consists of visual material provided by another person.
(g) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another law, the actor may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's it. That's the ticket. He is a victim. Sneederbunk Nov 2017 #1
another anonymous claimant. maybe he is being extorted eh? nt msongs Nov 2017 #2
Thats what it sounds like jberryhill Nov 2017 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author LisaL Nov 2017 #7
As far as I can see he is a victim Loki Liesmith Nov 2017 #3
And some people here totally buying it. LisaL Nov 2017 #5
This Shit Is A Tit For Tat Grassy Knoll Nov 2017 #6
I'm not a lawyer..and I don't play one on tv... sarah FAILIN Nov 2017 #8
That's my question as well. LisaL Nov 2017 #9
It's almost like a Saturday Night Live take on a penis picture womanofthehills Nov 2017 #67
In Texas releasing nude photos sent to you without permission of the individual is against the law. tammywammy Nov 2017 #10
What if said individual send you these photos without you asking for them? LisaL Nov 2017 #11
It is a Class A misdemeanor tammywammy Nov 2017 #15
She doesn't admit to publicly posting it. LisaL Nov 2017 #18
She shared it with someone and it's been posted on the internet. tammywammy Nov 2017 #21
Actually, we don't know what ended up on the internet. LisaL Nov 2017 #22
I say turn them over to the proper law enforcement, not publicly Luz Nov 2017 #45
I still don't agree with the law, because it puts burden on a receiver of images to LisaL Nov 2017 #52
Only if she was in Texas? sarah FAILIN Nov 2017 #12
I don't think this would qualify as revenge porn. LisaL Nov 2017 #13
Agreed sarah FAILIN Nov 2017 #17
Revenge porn or nonconsensual pornography is illegal in most states and DC madville Nov 2017 #14
So you are claiming the burden is on whoever got those videos (even if they didn't ask for them) is LisaL Nov 2017 #16
That's the law in Texas madville Nov 2017 #19
Doesn't sound like a good law. LisaL Nov 2017 #20
There are versions of it in 40 states and DC now madville Nov 2017 #23
Well, I think it's bizarre that I would be required to keep private something sent to me, whether I LisaL Nov 2017 #24
So, imagine you're in a relationship with someone. tammywammy Nov 2017 #25
The woman in question claims she didn't want the photos. LisaL Nov 2017 #26
I've been sent unsolicited dick pics. tammywammy Nov 2017 #29
So you think when this guy send it to you without even asking, he had a reasonable expectation of LisaL Nov 2017 #31
Yes. I don't think they expect the receiver to share the photo or post it on the internet. n/t tammywammy Nov 2017 #34
Maybe then they shouldn't send it. LisaL Nov 2017 #35
I think that expectation is unreasonable. Unsolicited pics are different from VermontKevin Nov 2017 #42
Yeah, so in response, she flew to Washington, slept with him, carried on for a while, jberryhill Nov 2017 #44
if she didn't want them, why did she keep them? onenote Nov 2017 #49
That law is kind of bizarre. LisaL Nov 2017 #61
Solicited or not, it's not illegal in most places for an adult to send an adult a nude picture. madville Nov 2017 #27
Not everybody wants to see that. LisaL Nov 2017 #28
The laws are intended to protect women madville Nov 2017 #33
If his private part is covered by a blue box, I don't think it qualifies as revenge porn, since the LisaL Nov 2017 #38
That was added after the initial release jberryhill Nov 2017 #43
I can tell you exactly where I got the tidbit-twitter. I didn't see the actual video, just a claim LisaL Nov 2017 #47
The important point is that she got them while them two were in a relationship. DetlefK Nov 2017 #53
I don't see anything in the text of the law supporting that idea. LisaL Nov 2017 #58
See response #19 DetlefK Nov 2017 #60
Once you give me something, isn't it my property? Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #55
That's the thing I don't understand about this law. LisaL Nov 2017 #56
I agree, the law can't protect people from their own stupidity. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #59
Are you actually asking that sincerely? How have you not been aware of revenge porn? mythology Nov 2017 #62
Who made him take the picture and send it. Demtexan Nov 2017 #30
Married. LisaL Nov 2017 #32
Then his wife is the victim. Demtexan Nov 2017 #36
Wife asked for divorce in 2014, so he is divorced now. LisaL Nov 2017 #37
Do not blame her. Demtexan Nov 2017 #39
perhaps Barton and Trump could have a dick contest Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #40
How do men like that pee when they can't see the plumbing without a mirror? L. Coyote Nov 2017 #51
the same way women do Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #63
I weigh significantly more than Barton does Blue_Adept Nov 2017 #68
Making good on his promise. Lars39 Nov 2017 #41
She probably broke the law, but would a jury convict her? I don't think so. FarCenter Nov 2017 #46
Here's the first question I'd like investigators to ask - Vinca Nov 2017 #48
Lest we forget, Smokey Joe voted for Bill Clintons impeachment k Vogon_Glory Nov 2017 #50
Adultery isn't against the law. shanny Nov 2017 #54
So per this law, a married can can be sending you photos of his genitals, even if you didn't ask for LisaL Nov 2017 #57
issue is consenting adults, as was apparently the case shanny Nov 2017 #64
Where does it say so in the actual law? LisaL Nov 2017 #65
which law? which state? there's lots shanny Nov 2017 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Barton: Capitol Police in...»Reply #25