General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ban guns? I have ONE word to answer that notion... HALABJA [View all]GaYellowDawg
(5,071 posts)Maybe bold and capital letters are the way to go here.
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO MENTIONED HALABJA IN YOUR POST TITLE.
HALABJA WAS A GAS ATTACK ON KURDS, BY HUSSEIN'S GOVERNMENT.
YOU IMPLIED THAT GUN OWNERSHIP WOULD PREVENT EVENTS LIKE HALABJA.
I SAID THAT PRIVATE GUN OWNERSHIP WOULD NOT PREVENT EVENTS LIKE HALABJA; E.G., A GAS ATTACK ON A CIVILIAN POPULATION BY A PROFESSIONAL ARMY.
[H1]IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, DID I EVER ADVOCATE OR SUPPORT A MILITARY GAS ATTACK ON ANYONE, MUCH LESS UNITED STATES CITIZENS.[/H1]
I don't know what kind of torturous excuse for a thought process got you from being the one to mention Halabja to me advocating a gas attack, but holy shit, the fact that you are that hysterical and stupid and own guns is the goddamndest best fucking argument for gun control that I've seen on this board.