Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mucifer

(25,690 posts)
Sat Nov 25, 2017, 09:37 AM Nov 2017

LA Times: Mueller's Record Has Lots of Flaws [View all]

But at 73, Mueller's record also shows a man of fallible judgment who can be slow to alter his chosen course. At times, he has intimidated or provoked resentment among subordinates. And his tenacious yet linear approach to evaluating evidence led him to fumble the biggest U.S. terrorism investigation since 9/11.


Mueller led a team of four prosecutors in court when the second trial, with 11 defendants, began in October 1980. But after four months, the jury said it was deadlocked, and the judge declared a mistrial. Mueller decided not to ask for a retrial.

Richard B. Mazer, a defense lawyer at both trials, said the government was unable to prove the Hells Angels was a racketeering enterprise. Key prosecution witnesses, he said, seemed unreliable — especially those granted immunity to testify despite having committed violent crimes themselves.

"They made a mess of it," Mazer recalled. "It was an entirely snitch case. It depended entirely on the quality of snitches."



http://beta.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mueller-record-20171122-story.html

Oy Vey! I hope this investigative piece from the LA Times doesn't prove to be what's coming for our country.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
they will do their best to destroy Mueller the closer he gets to trump spanone Nov 2017 #1
"They" are here on DU too. BoneyardDem Nov 2017 #17
Yup MFM008 Nov 2017 #24
37 years I would hazard a guess young Mueller was a tad less experienced than now? Fred Sanders Nov 2017 #25
RWers have taken over the LA times Iliyah Nov 2017 #2
"RWers have taken over the LA times." LenaBaby61 Nov 2017 #29
There is no agenda behind this article dalton99a Nov 2017 #3
Why didn't Rosenstein choose a prosecutor with a perfect record? oasis Nov 2017 #4
This is all they have on Mueller? One botched case 40 years ago? Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #15
Mueller had overwhelming support across the board when oasis Nov 2017 #21
His record in Viet Nam told me all I needed to know about the man. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #22
Do you think............ MyOwnPeace Nov 2017 #5
They seem concerned. Cracklin Charlie Nov 2017 #6
Yeah? FUCK YOU, Sam Zell! Chasstev365 Nov 2017 #7
+1 dalton99a Nov 2017 #8
This is the 2nd time this article has been posted here in GD. Ya gotta wonder. Kaleva Nov 2017 #9
Nothing to wonder , for me. I know what is going on. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2017 #12
It's obvious. yardwork Nov 2017 #16
I am glad it was posted. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2017 #23
What might be similar is the complete lack of moral character dembotoz Nov 2017 #10
LA Times Billb93 Nov 2017 #11
Right wing attacks on Mueller himself. We all knew it was coming Roland99 Nov 2017 #13
Mueller has probably been expecting it...... nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #14
Prosecutors are often creeps, why not Mueller? Trump should worry. Cicada Nov 2017 #18
Yes, lots of flaws in that 1980 trial (!) gratuitous Nov 2017 #19
what a bullshit hit piece. That someone decides to impugn the capabilities of an on-going still_one Nov 2017 #20
Et tu LA Times? Sneederbunk Nov 2017 #26
Interesting. Tatiana Nov 2017 #27
Good. GallopingGhost Nov 2017 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LA Times: Mueller's Reco...