Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In NJ, James Holmes likely would have been caught before committing his massacre [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)19. Should we have test for voting, too?
I am not willing to submit to government permission to own firearms just because every once and a while a lunatic uses one to kill people.
The right to keep and bear arms is a Constitutionally enumerated individual right.
No one should have to demonstrate competence to speak or to vote. Likewise to own firearms.
If you have been adjudicated mentally incompetent or have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution, you should fail your NICS check.
If you want to talk about other ways, that respect due process, to lose your right to keep and bear arms, I'm all ears. But it must respect the due process of law, and it must preserve anonymous firearm ownership.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In NJ, James Holmes likely would have been caught before committing his massacre [View all]
brentspeak
Jul 2012
OP
Even in a perfect society, we must be able to filter out the potentially harmful ones.
Gregorian
Jul 2012
#7
I refered to the OP's take on the matter. It has nothing to do with voting rights.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#13
Fortunately the courts are not taking such a cavalier attitude towards our constitutional rights
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#37
Fortunately, courts can be changed and rights for others can be secured by them.
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#107
I'm sorry you had a bad experience. But checking out mental health should be an ohjective criteria.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#71
The OP didn describe a state with what you term as subjective gun laws. What you describe is not
freshwest
Jul 2012
#75
Our police chief has saved countless lives including one suicide that I know of.
Walk away
Jul 2012
#77
Would you agree to the same to be allowed to exercise other rights, such as voting?
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#70
Fuck my creditability, I don't give a shit, credibility is for Repukes to defend
DainBramaged
Jul 2012
#114
I've voted straight Democratic ticket since I turned 18 over 4 decades ago, and I voted for
DainBramaged
Jul 2012
#98
How about you offer up something that isn't rehashed and fallacy filled cliche first.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#118
Wow, looks like you support the selling of death without question. What do the nuts say
DainBramaged
Jul 2012
#73
I was somewhat surprised that there was not an off duty or retired LEO in the crowd
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#103
Following the law: the movie theater forbids even CCW holders to carry on their property
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#133
He broke laws by taking loaded weapons into a movie theater and shooting a bunch of people
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#138