Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(52,723 posts)
3. Actually, no.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 11:03 AM
Nov 2017

This is what most Liberals think it is. It's actually far worse. There is trickle down, but it is patronage inducement money. Simply put, there's not enough to go around so those at the top, which tend to be autocratic, use it to reward those that do not challenge them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R 2naSalit Nov 2017 #1
Tax cuts and supply side economics do not work Gothmog Nov 2017 #2
tax cuts can work but only in very specific situations that don't often occur in practice unblock Nov 2017 #4
Actually, no. Baitball Blogger Nov 2017 #3
Today's 1% aren't Carnegies or Rockefellers BigmanPigman Nov 2017 #5
The 1% don't invest extra money in companies. Middle class start companies. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #6
+1 dalton99a Nov 2017 #7
I've been designing BillyBobBrilliant Nov 2017 #8
Russian sex workers can confirm that. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #9
K&R smirkymonkey Nov 2017 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How "Trickle-Down" Really...»Reply #3