Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT: 'On Gay Rights, Obama Lets Surrogates Lead' [View all]Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)35. Sometimes it comes from just wanting to feel special and "different." I know black Republicans who
all they know are the talking points. When I quarrel with them about actual policies and issues, I learn that they know absolutely NOTHING about the RepubliCON platform but have just bought into the "I hate government" propaganda. (I am a black woman.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sometimes it comes from just wanting to feel special and "different." I know black Republicans who
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#35
There is little indication that Mr. Obama plans to endorse same-sex marriage before the presidential
MADem
Dec 2011
#3
I agree 100% as opposed to Mr. Clinton who went around southern states bragging about DOMA.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#36
Sorry, that's what I meant to say. My point is that people are upset with Obama
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#41
Then, I can't understand why some refuse to give Obama the *SAME* benefit of the doubt.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#45
Yes, because Bill Clinton didn't support it. He ran on banning gay marriage and let liberals
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#37
When 'AIDS activists' intreupped a Presidential speech, all of DU called them 'gay activists'
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#23
Duh. My point is that it is not JUST ours, and yet when anyone speaks on AIDS
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2012
#48
It's words, not policy. What were his actions? He signed a law banning funding for needle exchanges,
LeftyMom
Dec 2011
#20
Except that the FACT is that he is opposed to marriage equality, that is our
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#25
Using marriage equality to bash the President when he's done so much in other places
Bolo Boffin
Dec 2011
#28
He is using it to claim his kind are superior to our kind, he is the one opposing us
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2012
#49
I don't think he said that he's "done enough." Nowhere did I see that language. Unfair
MADem
Dec 2011
#15
Yes! And it's laughable that so many support Ron Paul. Do they really think that voting for Paul
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#38
Ron Paul was only too pleased to take the endorsement of that nutty pastor who advocated death for
MADem
Jan 2012
#40
The issue is not that he has not 'made marriage legal' it is that he speaks his opposition
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#26
He's called for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage act. He calls it unconstitutional
Bolo Boffin
Dec 2011
#29
Barack Obama, a black man in 2011, has taken a "state's rights" approach toward gay marriage.
Occulus
Jan 2012
#33
Starting with McClurkin, his surrogates always did that part. Sent the message he
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#24
I believe that Obama must travel down this road, sadly, because this country is STLL a bigoted
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#34