Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

underpants

(197,274 posts)

2. No you pretty much nailed it

Reply to Garion_55 (Original post)

Thu Nov 30, 2017, 04:50 PM

Nov 2017

The first part has absolutely no precedent to back it up - there is no example of cutting taxes for the top creates enough revenue to cover the cuts. It may increase revenue but net there is less revenue received.

Look, bottom line is that they represent polluters and racists. Wanting the government to "do less" means less regulation and prosecution.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Failed Right Wing Tax Logic [View all] Garion_55 Nov 2017 OP

I fear that this, like the Iraq war and all the other shit they have shoved down our throats The_Casual_Observer Nov 2017 #1

No you pretty much nailed it underpants Nov 2017 #2

Having trouble deciphering what this means MichMan Nov 2017 #3

There can be an increase in revenue underpants Nov 2017 #4