Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

backscatter712

(26,357 posts)

4. He was not just CEO in title, he was sole stockholder - in other words, the OWNER.

Reply to WCGreen (Original post)

Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:28 AM

Jul 2012

No matter how much he tries to show he removed himself from the decision-making process, he OWNED Bain. Which means he called the shots, and delegated power to people who called the shots for him, and if he doesn't like the decisions made by those he delegated power to, he replaced them.

The buck stops with Rmoney.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Something about business that we all ought to remember... [View all] WCGreen Jul 2012 OP

Very True, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2012 #1

Good one Magistrate.... WCGreen Jul 2012 #2

It's true. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2012 #3

He was not just CEO in title, he was sole stockholder - in other words, the OWNER. backscatter712 Jul 2012 #4