Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
71. That, and "what can we do about voter suppression?"
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 10:25 PM
Dec 2017

and "why did a majority of white voters in almost every demographic vote for Trump, and what can we do to do better?"

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The far left is an issue. nycbos Dec 2017 #1
How big do you feel this amorphous "far left" is? guillaumeb Dec 2017 #4
It's not how big, it's how LOUD. And they were very, very loud. They were staunchly Squinch Dec 2017 #22
Speculation. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #39
And your position is no less speculation. But I don't really see how you can deny that those Squinch Dec 2017 #43
Squinch is correct. And OP, 42% didn't vote. 58% of 200M registered voters, Hortensis Dec 2017 #180
Hortensis, he recognized (gave respect) to KPN Dec 2017 #192
This message was self-deleted by its author KPN Dec 2017 #190
And the media covered them, during Obama's years as well, mcar Dec 2017 #52
But 1) Obama had not been successfully and completely baselessly smeared as "crooked." Squinch Dec 2017 #104
The "both parties are the same" BS came up way before Susan Sarandon ever said it mdbl Dec 2017 #85
Bullshit. When it started is not the point. It was a battle cry in this election. It was constant Squinch Dec 2017 #94
Russia pushed the rw memes hard, so yes, in a way it did. lark Dec 2017 #226
Interesting point of view. sheshe2 Dec 2017 #117
Good catch! n/t radical noodle Dec 2017 #134
No it's not melman Dec 2017 #222
You forgot corporatist. Lunabell Dec 2017 #29
Non-voting is an issue whathehell Dec 2017 #70
There is no "the left". It's not a singular thing. They are the left(s). JHB Dec 2017 #92
The primary is over and the abuse was universal. Shit was thrown at Bernie supporters, too .... marble falls Dec 2017 #110
Bernie's supporters are STILL owed a collective apology Ken Burch Dec 2017 #120
Yeah but its not going to come and any retribution will only hurt us all. 2018 it the real objective marble falls Dec 2017 #122
Sad, but true. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2017 #124
I don't want retribution. Just an acceptance of the fact that Sanders supporters are NOT the enemy. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #136
Bernie is still working hard for us all. But some of us here will never own up to their abuse ... marble falls Dec 2017 #142
Well said, and agreed. eom guillaumeb Dec 2017 #220
Just. Stop. FFS. nt Skidmore Dec 2017 #236
This message was self-deleted by its author MrsCoffee Dec 2017 #186
Post removed Post removed Dec 2017 #194
You Mean Identity Politics Me. Dec 2017 #208
No, I don't mean that, because I've never defended what Bernie said there Ken Burch Dec 2017 #229
But Yet According To You Me. Dec 2017 #230
What I'm saying is, make a distinction between Bernie and his supporters. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #231
You Mean Separate The Child From The Parent? Me. Dec 2017 #233
There is. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #243
Of Course We Can Move On Me. Dec 2017 #248
The shortcoming of the message from a now-ended campaign no longer matter. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #287
Perhaps You Missed The Ongoing Message Me. Dec 2017 #288
What they support is the economic justice message Ken Burch Dec 2017 #290
Here's The Problem With Your Insistence Me. Dec 2017 #293
"Our Revolution has a stated interest in voting for the Cons"? Ken Burch Dec 2017 #294
This Me. Dec 2017 #309
Yeah. I remember hearing about this I think. I know I have seen it alleged and now we know it is Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #311
... Me. Dec 2017 #313
Woah! sheshe2 Dec 2017 #314
Great facts Gothmog Dec 2017 #315
Since no Republican or LIbertarian would ever take such a position... Ken Burch Dec 2017 #316
Yet it is in fact a quote. sheshe2 Dec 2017 #317
I agree that they shouldn't have said it. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #318
Nice Try Me. Dec 2017 #319
Aahhh sheshe2 Dec 2017 #321
And this... lapucelle Dec 2017 #324
That Is Even Better THan My Example Me. Dec 2017 #325
,,, lapucelle Dec 2017 #326
Ken, if you don't let it go then you can't expect anyone else to either Cary Dec 2017 #244
Well... at least you tried. And you were thoughtful, sincere and kind about it, too. NurseJackie Dec 2017 #247
DAYUM, NurseJackie - that's a great one! calimary Dec 2017 #251
I have decided to take the high road and just speak my truth Cary Dec 2017 #267
Wow Me. Dec 2017 #320
I have no idea why he is allowed to peddle his garbage here. moda253 Dec 2017 #289
No argument here Cary Dec 2017 #292
So true! He should be calling out this endless divisiveness, R B Garr Dec 2017 #334
Oh, good lord! Stop it. NurseJackie Dec 2017 #237
Amazing response. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #277
Aww... thanks very much! Very sweet of you to notice. NurseJackie Dec 2017 #286
speechless Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #254
I condemned the bad things some Sanders supporters said a LONG time ago. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #256
LOL! (If only!) NurseJackie Dec 2017 #261
;) sheshe2 Dec 2017 #323
You're confusing 'insinuation' and 'inference of questionable accuracy' again. LanternWaste Dec 2017 #272
I disagree strongly with your claims Gothmog Dec 2017 #284
So you SAY "Let's deal with 2018" but then you pop right on to refighting the primary. SMH. Squinch Dec 2017 #145
Reread. I said abuse was tossed from both sides. I said the primary is over. I said waiting .... marble falls Dec 2017 #150
. Squinch Dec 2017 #153
None so ignorant as the wilfully ignorant. I got better things to do. You keep on refighting 2016. marble falls Dec 2017 #157
Then do get on with them and stop refighting the primary. Squinch Dec 2017 #160
Look in the mirror. KTM Dec 2017 #178
I said nothing about the primary except to point out the rehash of it. I don't do the rehashes. Squinch Dec 2017 #183
Again, mirror. KTM Dec 2017 #185
Link to any post where I have rehashed. Squinch Dec 2017 #204
Reread my post. 'There was shit thrown by both sides. Get past it and start dealing with what we... marble falls Dec 2017 #332
No...the shit was aimed at Hillary by the left left (green riffraff), Republicans and Russians... Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #331
I voted for Clinton and opposed her foreign policy. David__77 Dec 2017 #181
you think hillary's vote to attack iraq is insignificant? nt tomp Dec 2017 #189
She admitted she made a mistake. nycbos Dec 2017 #196
oh, please! tomp Dec 2017 #200
She got more flack then others because she is a women. nycbos Dec 2017 #223
Bulls**t. tomp Dec 2017 #240
"The left has a big problem with sexism"? LiberalLovinLug Dec 2017 #245
maybe people were trying to tell her something that would have helped her win. yurbud Dec 2017 #296
I'm with you friend, another Democratic Socialist, proud Progressive here! LongTomH Dec 2017 #2
Thanks LTH guillaumeb Dec 2017 #5
Perhaps those hungry for real solutions sheshe2 Dec 2017 #24
Yes, and yes,and yes, guillaumeb Dec 2017 #40
Yet Democrats. sheshe2 Dec 2017 #50
We cannot win by chasing the same voters who happily vote for the GOP. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #59
In that case +1000 sheshe2 Dec 2017 #227
Agreed. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #263
Ok, that's the problem. What's the solution? ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #51
The GOP has successfully framed the narrative since 1980. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #61
But see what I'm getting at here? ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #74
We are losing seats for a variety of reasons. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #77
Good point ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #79
We've been losing seats (and states) rather consistantly since the mid-90's rpannier Dec 2017 #88
Thus my statement: guillaumeb Dec 2017 #203
I do not have the answers. sheshe2 Dec 2017 #80
So right you are. Thanks for pointing this out. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #121
Yes, it's up to us to make sure people vote. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #119
actions speak louder than words Fiendish Thingy Dec 2017 #132
Excellent observations. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #211
We talked about idealists vs pragmatists wasupaloopa Dec 2017 #55
An excellent distinction. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #69
Being an idealist radical noodle Dec 2017 #135
Wise words DeeDeeNY Dec 2017 #3
Thank YOU. oem guillaumeb Dec 2017 #6
+100 HopeAgain Dec 2017 #7
Thank YOU. oem guillaumeb Dec 2017 #8
Democrats: billh58 Dec 2017 #9
Agreed, but not all voters are as enthusiastic or informed guillaumeb Dec 2017 #12
The clear alternatives billh58 Dec 2017 #17
Your list is a Sanders' list George Eliot Dec 2017 #35
The Clinton that Reich is talking about in that article is Bill, not Hillary. lapucelle Dec 2017 #86
Not when 2 for the price of 1 is a offered as an asset. aikoaiko Dec 2017 #224
This characterization of the clintons is bogus. tomp Dec 2017 #253
Some prefer to rely on data and professional analytics lapucelle Dec 2017 #259
Both parties are not at all the same. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #36
Wonder if people will respond ... seems anger and blame provoke responses over thoughtful posts George Eliot Dec 2017 #10
Anger and blame have their places, guillaumeb Dec 2017 #44
Odd response. Apathy due to what exactly? Who are these apathetic voters? George Eliot Dec 2017 #63
The young voted in large numbers for Sanders, guillaumeb Dec 2017 #66
Reagann democrats mdbl Dec 2017 #83
Or a recognition that the Democratic Party is not of one mind on everything. eom guillaumeb Dec 2017 #202
Collectively, it would be nice if we found common ground again mdbl Dec 2017 #270
No, it's not FDR policy. It's the wing of the party that has one issue and that takes its ball Squinch Dec 2017 #106
+1 emulatorloo Dec 2017 #130
+1 betsuni Dec 2017 #140
Your response is inflammatory and I can't figure out what that "ball" is... George Eliot Dec 2017 #154
This message was self-deleted by its author Squinch Dec 2017 #158
Everyone who advocated not voting for Clinton is to blame greeny2323 Dec 2017 #11
And the 48% who did not vote? guillaumeb Dec 2017 #13
We blame them for listening to the a-holes saying not to vote for Clinton too Steven Maurer Dec 2017 #250
Simplistic thinking. How explain the Trump win when so many Republicans advocated not voting Trump? George Eliot Dec 2017 #15
Not after the primary was over. Once Trump(R) was the candidate, they did what Squinch Dec 2017 #143
personal insult? Let me know what you regard as an insult please George Eliot Dec 2017 #151
If you don't know when you are insulting people, that's yours to fix, not mine. Squinch Dec 2017 #155
Ah... George Eliot Dec 2017 #171
Tom Perez is working to reach out to them. NCTraveler Dec 2017 #14
Perez is wrong person to reach out. He is exactly what blue collar voted against. Do your hw. George Eliot Dec 2017 #16
. NCTraveler Dec 2017 #18
Yes. Kicking, screaming and tantrums trump reading & info every time. George Eliot Dec 2017 #23
You know this makes no sense whatsoever, right? Squinch Dec 2017 #144
what? that little cartoon kicking and screaming? haha George Eliot Dec 2017 #148
No, I get it fine. It's just that you, superior though you think you are, are making no sense. Squinch Dec 2017 #149
You are too emotional to see it. Reason is futile when emotions take over. George Eliot Dec 2017 #159
I see you George. I know. Your slip has fallen. Squinch Dec 2017 #161
??? George Eliot Dec 2017 #164
This is complicated. Squinch Dec 2017 #165
Seriously. NCTraveler Dec 2017 #167
It's actually a tactic used very consistently. Squinch Dec 2017 #170
whatever could THAT mean? it means lots of RWNJ's and russian trolls. stonecutter357 Dec 2017 #177
Ayup. Squinch Dec 2017 #182
Quite the contrary. I hope people read it. It expresses the disappointment in the current policies George Eliot Dec 2017 #174
I think that is an ROFL icon. lapucelle Dec 2017 #268
This message was self-deleted by its author George Eliot Dec 2017 #20
What blue collar? mcar Dec 2017 #54
The racists. They don't like Perez- shocking! bettyellen Dec 2017 #216
Make that Old white men. Wwcd Dec 2017 #305
You clearly know nothing about Tom Perez emulatorloo Dec 2017 #131
fail... stonecutter357 Dec 2017 #176
"He is exactly what blue collar voted against" - yeah they loved "The Wall" and hated DACA- bettyellen Dec 2017 #215
Your position is also clear. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #45
Thanks - too many purposefully deaf . bagelsforbreakfast Dec 2017 #97
I was stating the obvious. NCTraveler Dec 2017 #168
You were obviously framing. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #207
Those who judge will never understand and those who understand will never judge George Eliot Dec 2017 #175
Why did 48% of eligible, registered voters decide to not vote in 2016? OilemFirchen Dec 2017 #19
You can do better. George Eliot Dec 2017 #25
Not for this crowd. OilemFirchen Dec 2017 #31
This was the first presidential election since the gutting of the Voting Rights Act. lapucelle Dec 2017 #328
Thanks from an FDR Democrat! George Eliot Dec 2017 #21
Thank you thank you! DangerousUrNot Dec 2017 #26
THANKS, guill! elleng Dec 2017 #27
You are welcome. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #47
Exactly. elleng Dec 2017 #57
Because they never do. applegrove Dec 2017 #28
But why? guillaumeb Dec 2017 #48
They are made to feel apathetic by not having their issues solved. But applegrove Dec 2017 #75
True. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #78
Agreed and thank you. MuseRider Dec 2017 #30
+1 George Eliot Dec 2017 #37
This! Lunabell Dec 2017 #32
Me, too. BadgerMom Dec 2017 #42
I also voted for Hillary Lunabell Dec 2017 #46
what A-Schwarzenegger Dec 2017 #33
It's not easy for some folks to take off work oberliner Dec 2017 #34
True. There are many reasons. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #49
Register absentee rpannier Dec 2017 #89
Voting should be made as easy as possible oberliner Dec 2017 #112
Agreed rpannier Dec 2017 #127
I agree that we need to get more people out to the polls and motivated. Willie Pep Dec 2017 #38
That question is asked after every loss Progressive dog Dec 2017 #41
Well said. They are a very self-important group, the far left, assuming that they, and only... NNadir Dec 2017 #62
You beat me to it. OP doesnt realize that they are part of the problem stevenleser Dec 2017 #111
+1 chwaliszewski Dec 2017 #53
Too damn much squabbling here, folks. elleng Dec 2017 #56
Probably the same reason they didn't vote for decades previously... brooklynite Dec 2017 #58
While true GaryCnf Dec 2017 #114
Oh please Cary Dec 2017 #60
Illustrative of the issue that I attempted to address. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #65
Yawn. Cary Dec 2017 #108
Yawn if you will, as Democrats lose seats. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #206
So you're claiming superiority? Cary Dec 2017 #210
You are entitled to your opinion. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #217
Gee, thanks Cary Dec 2017 #235
What you call reality is your opinion of what constitutes reality. eom guillaumeb Dec 2017 #264
I'm correct. Cary Dec 2017 #269
I understand your viewpoint. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #274
My motivation is to defeat Republicans and elect Democrats Cary Dec 2017 #276
👍 OilemFirchen Dec 2017 #68
What's wrong with incremental solutions? Tavarious Jackson Dec 2017 #64
FDR pursued large change. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #72
It was a different time Tavarious Jackson Dec 2017 #82
I agree with you. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #205
Large change in limited sectors lapucelle Dec 2017 #93
FDR was able to pursue "large change" thucythucy Dec 2017 #98
The country was in different shape then and those who benefited were mostly white JI7 Dec 2017 #103
I'm fine with your targeting idea rpannier Dec 2017 #91
I see the opposite happening Tavarious Jackson Dec 2017 #95
Part of that 48% was people who thought Hillary would win because she was "inevitable." Tatiana Dec 2017 #67
Recommended. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #73
That, and "what can we do about voter suppression?" Spider Jerusalem Dec 2017 #71
True. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #76
Agreed. Voter suppression plus misrepresentation via the Electoral College stuffmatters Dec 2017 #262
I agree but that will require change in the policies/priorities of the party. George Eliot Dec 2017 #81
Imagine that I don't care why they didn't vote leftofcool Dec 2017 #84
Post removed Post removed Dec 2017 #87
Voter turnout in 2016 was 60%. Other than 2008 (61.6) and 2004 (60.1) we haven't had a Presidential seaglass Dec 2017 #90
The term far left is a right wing meme. Scruffy1 Dec 2017 #96
Yup. zentrum Dec 2017 #100
+1 leftstreet Dec 2017 #113
+1 CNN debate had Cruz calling Sanders "socialist" as often as he could fit it in. George Eliot Dec 2017 #152
+1000 LongTomH Dec 2017 #201
Keith Ellison zentrum Dec 2017 #99
Why don't those who complain and attack the democratic party get those votes ? JI7 Dec 2017 #101
Excellent question. Squinch Dec 2017 #105
Did it occur to you that those who are green are pretty smart people and knew that if they George Eliot Dec 2017 #169
Thank you from this lefty. mountain grammy Dec 2017 #102
Voting rickyhall Dec 2017 #107
Thank you! denvine Dec 2017 #109
Imagine all the people... Snackshack Dec 2017 #115
Very true. Far easier to blame than to fix. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #214
Fairly simple really... Adrahil Dec 2017 #116
I could consider myself 'far left' - about as far left as you can go. Stonepounder Dec 2017 #118
You are saying both parties are the same. You are saying that today, in this moment, Squinch Dec 2017 #146
That's interesting.The party has become the party of professionals. At least that's the slant I've George Eliot Dec 2017 #172
Sounds good on paper NanceGreggs Dec 2017 #123
Good thread. I really felt Hillary would win, and I wasn't thrilled.. mvd Dec 2017 #125
I belong and support the DSA The_Casual_Observer Dec 2017 #126
Right on! caraher Dec 2017 #128
I think real liberal candidate will win. Not some "progressive", or just enough to not brewens Dec 2017 #129
Single payer and economic justice do not make a "real liberal." A REAL liberal Squinch Dec 2017 #147
Arguing for the sake of arguing. Racial justice and gender justice depend on economic justice. George Eliot Dec 2017 #162
I'm all for that too. If a candidate does not want single payer and economic justice. I'm brewens Dec 2017 #179
And if a candidate does not equally prioritize racial and gender justice, I'm not interested. Squinch Dec 2017 #184
RW myth. In fact, Nov. '16 turnout broke records. In CA it was 75.27%. ucrdem Dec 2017 #133
Thank you. Trump did motivate a group of people that were looking for economic help. Many were dems George Eliot Dec 2017 #163
Yes, that was semi-official meme 2.0, after the low-turnout meme was exposed. ucrdem Dec 2017 #197
Do you have evidence for that? I can believe it but would like to see some evidence. George Eliot Dec 2017 #246
Screen-shots: Wisconsin vote totals don't match ballots cast ucrdem Dec 2017 #258
This assumes no voter depresion by the Republicans. joshcryer Dec 2017 #137
nah I'm good critiquing forces which only serve to further supress votes, or lead to bad outcomes JHan Dec 2017 #138
+1 betsuni Dec 2017 #141
Imagine you have malcontents on the left blaming Democrats for the passage of the tax bill. JHan Dec 2017 #241
Bravo! jimlup Dec 2017 #139
What happened JustAnotherGen Dec 2017 #156
First off GaryCnf Dec 2017 #257
One more thing GaryCnf Dec 2017 #260
The far left provides the same results as the far right. democratisphere Dec 2017 #166
How could the Democratic Party fix that? George Eliot Dec 2017 #173
"why the 48% of non-voters did not vote?" honest.abe Dec 2017 #187
Welcome to DU, and the discussion. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #218
My thoughts? You are 100% dead on KPN Dec 2017 #188
cross-posted from another thread: tomp Dec 2017 #191
Careful. CrispyQ Dec 2017 #198
i'm thoroughly familiar with such labeling.... tomp Dec 2017 #213
Want to solve the turnout issue? have another civil war or a mandatory draft.... Fresh_Start Dec 2017 #193
Essentially write off a large percentage of the electorate? guillaumeb Dec 2017 #219
I've said this all along. CrispyQ Dec 2017 #195
Many will never vote unless forced. xmas74 Dec 2017 #199
There's good evidence of why people don't vote... Sancho Dec 2017 #209
An excellent addition. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #212
I agree that the DNC, local Democratic candidates, etc. don't put election processes at the top. Sancho Dec 2017 #238
+1 Martin Eden Dec 2017 #249
A very large percentage of non-voters would vote Democratic if they did vote. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #221
You see. Blue_true Dec 2017 #225
Voter suppression through new and onerous ID laws, pnwmom Dec 2017 #228
none on this, this heaven05 Dec 2017 #232
+1 Me. Dec 2017 #234
thank you for this thread Locrian Dec 2017 #239
Many "lefty haters" are like a dog gnawing on a bone left-of-center2012 Dec 2017 #242
"What if the Democratic Party could convince these apathetic non-voters to make a choice?" Martin Eden Dec 2017 #252
Excellent points. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #265
And acting upon it Martin Eden Dec 2017 #266
In my view, the Democratic Party, and Democratic voters guillaumeb Dec 2017 #273
Agreed Martin Eden Dec 2017 #283
Doesn't change the fact that the "far left" and 3rd party voters are an issue. Which they are. Lil Missy Dec 2017 #255
There have always been those who don't vote...if you are implying that it has to do with our message Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #271
So non-voters are unreachable? guillaumeb Dec 2017 #275
It depends. Some can't vote. Some are unreachable...and I think it is a waste of time to target them Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #295
I feel that we need to do both. eom guillaumeb Dec 2017 #299
We don't have the money...you ever notice how many people don't give to the DNC these days. Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #327
What if the exreme lefties (they often admit they are), voted in a manner that didn't help Trump? BoneyardDem Dec 2017 #278
How do you define the extreme left, guillaumeb Dec 2017 #280
as I'd already said in the post above...they often call it themselves. BoneyardDem Dec 2017 #282
I asked 2 questions. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #298
your second question implies a premise that has no baring on a win or a loss BoneyardDem Dec 2017 #310
I disagree. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #336
Imagine if we solved problems rather than simply point at them LanternWaste Dec 2017 #279
Hundreds, thousands, of posts would have not been posted. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #281
Imagine if, instead of trying to divide and bicker on a web forum, that someone actually FSogol Dec 2017 #285
Imagine reading #281, located directly above at this time. eom guillaumeb Dec 2017 #300
The river flows both ways Blue_Tires Dec 2017 #291
Imagine reading #281, located above. eom guillaumeb Dec 2017 #301
Fair enough, and I do the same Blue_Tires Dec 2017 #333
Good for you, and what you do. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #338
I can ask that question and blame the idiots that voted for Stein Downtown Hound Dec 2017 #297
Vote in November and for a Democrat, NO MATTER WHAT. Any democrat on the ballot will do. Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #302
And the first word is VOTE, and vote in every election. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #303
My recollection is people were pissed Obama didnt fix the entire health insurance problem in less Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #304
People expected President Obama to be a Superman, guillaumeb Dec 2017 #306
Imagine not blaiming the Democratic Party for all the damning one-liners the Kremlin told voters to Wwcd Dec 2017 #307
And imagine a media that was actually informative and unbiased. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #308
And imagine that media presenting a sound & solid policy platform from each candidate Wwcd Dec 2017 #312
True. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #337
Wow, the divisiveness he brings is what the Russians R B Garr Dec 2017 #322
This was the first presidential election since the gutting of the Voting Rights Act. lapucelle Dec 2017 #329
+1 betsuni Dec 2017 #330
An excellent response. And all part of the suppression of which I spoke. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #339
The demise of the Voting Rights Act and the Citizens United decision lapucelle Dec 2017 #343
You ignore the obvious. Trumpocalypse Dec 2017 #335
It is obvious if one accepts it as correct. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #340
Sounds like you're desperately trying to Trumpocalypse Dec 2017 #341
It sounds to me as if you misread the post. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #342
Didn't misread your post. Trumpocalypse Dec 2017 #344
Yup. Stump speech one liners. The bull shit was deep & everyone jumped in the same pool Wwcd Dec 2017 #345
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Imagine if, rather than b...»Reply #71